This is a graphic representation of MP accel data.
Shouldn't IMU and IMU2 data be correlated? When IMU and IMU2 data are analyzed, the results are a negative and week correlations between IMU and IMU2. If two chips sense data at different rates, the correlation won't be 100%. But they also shouldn't be negative. And, then data columns are swapped (IMU2z for IMU2x for example), the correlations become significant.
This could be some weird fluke. But can someone contact the MP programmers and have them check or explain this?
Replies
Is the MP data right or does it have the values switched? Decided to check with a longer flight.
The data looks switched to me.
Interesting. I'll do the same.