Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John M. Smith on January 7, 2009 at 2:53pm

Will this unit be able to have multiple waypoints uploaded?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by William Premerlani on January 7, 2009 at 4:38pm

John,
The C source code that I have written so far is for a "come home" feature, so there is only one waypoint. My intent is that this platform is for do-it-yourselfers to extend the firmware for features that they want, such as multiple waypoints. This would not be hard to do, since you would not have to change any of the interrupt drivers that handle tasks like generating pulses for the servos or communicating with the GPS. All you would have to do is extend the navigation routine.
As far as loading the waypoints, you could do this prior to launch either through a PIC debugger, or by writing your own command interface that would communicate through the spare serial link on the board.
Bill Premerlani

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by john jenkins on June 28, 2010 at 10:22am

hi, would this unit be able to takeoff and land autonomously? thanks in advance, john

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by William Premerlani on June 28, 2010 at 12:31pm

Hi John,

This unit will takeoff and land autonomously. Take a look at the following recent postings:

Three autonomous flights of an EasyStar.

Three autonomous flights of a GentleLady sailplane.

Two autonomous flights of a Funjet, flying at 200 meters/second.

Best regards,
Bill

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by yhc on January 7, 2009 at 4:50pm

Thanks for sharing information!

Can we use LS2003X Gps module for this board (5Hz,38400baudrate)?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by William Premerlani on January 7, 2009 at 5:11pm

Off the top of my head I cannot give you a complete answer. I will tell you what I know right now and get back to you with a more definitive answer.
The self test software and the "gentleNav" navigation software that I wrote for the board were developed using and EM406A SiRFIII, available from SparkFun for $59.95. If you have one of those, you can plug it into the board running my firmware and everything will work fine. That would be my recommendation.
You also should be able to interface with any of the other SiRFIII GPS radios if they have the same connector as the EM406A.
The board has a spare UART, so you could also work out a way to connect to it, and modify the firmware to use the spare UART.
The firmware expects the GPS to be running at 4800 baud, but it would be a very simple matter to change it to a different baud rate, all you have to do is load a different constant into the baud rate generator register.
I must say I like the idea of a 5Hz refresh rate, so as soon as I have some time, I will take a closer look at the LS2003X and get back to you with a better answer.
Bill Premerlani

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by William Premerlani on January 7, 2009 at 5:15pm

By the way, with the 3 gyros and 3 accelerometers on my revised board, you really don't need a 5 Hz GPS, 1 Hz will be just fine. In the spring I plan to write some firmware that will do aerobatics.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert O'Brien on January 12, 2009 at 1:39am

Gentlemen,
Congratulations !!!
What you have achieved here is incredible!
Sure, it's been done before... but not in civilian laboratories.

Back in the 1980's, I was tasked to build a 3 axis IMU from the existing Copperhead missiles' roll rate sensor.
The unit had a Coriolis effect rate sensor and an accelerometer for each axis. The mission was to provide data to a flight controller for an ejection seat system, controlling a gimbal mounted rocket motor for propulsion.

The unit was able to turn on and provide calibrated data within 140 mS. It had a maximum angular rate of 3000 degrees per second and an acceleration limit of > 2000 G. However, the unit was 4" cubed and weighed ~ 1.8 pounds. It consumed ~ 5 watts of electrical power!!!

We've come a long ways baby...

ROB

• ▶ Reply

3D RoboticsPermalink Reply by Chris Anderson on January 13, 2009 at 11:49pm

Robert, thanks for sharing that, which was fascinating. I can only guess at what it cost!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by UFO-MAN on January 15, 2009 at 11:31am

Hi. Nice and compact board with a nice processor.

I have checked out your test-code and I would like to use this board to test autonomous flight. You mention that you have written a come home feature. Does this mean that you have stabilization code that I could take a look at as well ?

UFO-MAN

• ▶ Reply

3D RoboticsPermalink Reply by Chris Anderson on January 15, 2009 at 11:45am

The stabalization code is on the board's home page.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by UFO-MAN on January 15, 2009 at 1:00pm

OK tnx. Just discovered the link at the upper part.

Those _.__. statements; are those macros that run inline assemly code?
Also, the __builtin_mulss statments; is that mapped to the specific DSP and wide accumulator hw architecture of the DspIC?

UFO-MAN

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 58
• Next ›
• Page