Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Andre S on July 3, 2012 at 11:52am

Just out of curiosity, why were you so unhappy with your fatshark glasses? Was it the dominator or an older model?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by robincfey on July 3, 2012 at 4:55pm

i have the fatshark predators the ones with the built in 5.8ghz and lcds , gamma is way to high ( even when turned to the lowest at the camera and the goggles,still looks to bright) one eye keeps cutting out due to the crappy Chinese soldering , and even with 5.8 ghz clover leaf antenna i was only getting about 150m distance before  losing signal , oh that was when i had them paired with the immersion rc 600mW 5.8Ghz which should be giving me alot more distance , regardless this is a conversation about goggles and that is why i dont like my fatsharks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Oliver Sumpton on December 8, 2012 at 10:06pm

Dude, the Epson's Moverio is very intriguing to say the least. Fatshark's make zero sense to me for flying a copter.

Sounds like Moverio does not have a video input by default. That said, Epson has shown a board that will let you input composite video:

http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/09/epson-moverio-video-input-board/

I assume though that this would make the trackpad and android part which you're also purchasing redundant.

Hopefully someone makes a similar device that is just the video overlay portion with composite video input.

OR I wonder if it's possible to say attach a MAVlink radio to the Android via like ADK or something and build some type of Augmented reality OSD system.

• ▶ Reply