I am researching what hardware platform to use for an ArduCopter.
The alternatives I'm looking at are:
-ArduCopter Quad kit
-ArduCopter Hexa kit
-Cheap 525-frame-based kit
I understand that the hexa will have more lifting power then the quad, and that a hexa, in theory, is able to avoid crashing when a single motor fails, but I have not found any information about other differentiating characteristics.
How do Quad and Hexa differ in handling in manual flight ? (Is the hexa smoother / less aerobatic ?)
Is there a difference in APM2 autopilot capability when it comes to handling Quad or Hexa ?
Does APM2 actually have a capability to recover a Hexa from single-motor failure ?
Questions, questions. Even partial answers would be quite helpful.
Thanks,
Knut
ps. I just got a Blade MQX for stick training, and can highly recommend it to multi rotor-beginners.
Hi Knut,
I think a hexa feels pretty much the same to fly as a quad except it will be a little less 'snappy'. The motor out capability is still theoretical for APM unfortunately.. that's really a secondary priority behind getting all the auto features working reliably. The APM handles both quads and hexas the same.. no differences in features or performance.
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.24 members
1297 members
79 members
183 members
690 members
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by
