Platform characteristics: Quad compared to Hexa ?

I am researching what hardware platform to use for an ArduCopter.

The alternatives I'm looking at are:

-ArduCopter Quad kit

-ArduCopter Hexa kit

-Cheap 525-frame-based kit

I understand that the hexa will have more lifting power then the quad, and that a hexa, in theory, is able to avoid crashing when a single motor fails, but I have not found any information about other differentiating characteristics. 

How do Quad and Hexa differ in handling in manual flight ? (Is the hexa smoother / less aerobatic ?)

Is there a difference in APM2 autopilot capability when it comes to handling Quad or Hexa ?

Does APM2 actually have a capability to recover a Hexa from single-motor failure ?

Questions, questions. Even partial answers would be quite helpful.

Thanks,

Knut

ps. I just got a Blade MQX for stick training, and can highly recommend it to multi rotor-beginners.

Tags: Choice, Hexa, Platform, Quad

Views: 285

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Knut,

I think a hexa feels pretty much the same to fly as a quad except it will be a little less 'snappy'. The motor out capability is still theoretical for APM unfortunately.. that's really a secondary priority behind getting all the auto features working reliably. The APM handles both quads and hexas the same.. no differences in features or performance.

Thank you for the reply. I think it will be a quad for me then. The Arducopter Quad is currently not shipping, so there's more time to think. Maybe a DJ Flamewheel - seems decent and is cheaper then the Arducopter.

Knut

RSS

Social Networking

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.

A list of all T3 contests is here

Advertisement

© 2013   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service