Hello all,

Anybody here has experience with trying to remove the export-control velocity and altitude limits from any of the popular GPS receivers? I am thinking U-blox, Mediatek or SiRF. I know these limits can be removed from the high-end units from Novatel, Ashtech or Trimble by going through some paperwork and paying the "tax", but I wonder if this is even possible for the hobby UAV level units.

 Ian

Clarifications: The application is high power rocketry where the limits will be passed so not removing the limits is not an option. Also I have done the process of removing the limits for Novatel units so I know this is possible if you meet the requirements.

Views: 806

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Does anyone know of any >60k ft capable modules that have been integrated with APM?  I'm interested in using GPS for HAB cut-down, autorelease + navigation.  I will be running the MediaTek up in the simulator over the next few weeks but I'm pretty confident that I already know the outcome. This test will be mainly to see how well it recovers. I'd prefer not to fly open loop.  There is a 2010 thread mentioning Inventek though I don't see evidence that it's been integrated with APM.

Additionally, does anyone have experience with the BMP085 above it's 9k spec?

Regards,  Larry

I have worked directly with sirf on high altitude , high dynamics firmware. I you have the sirf source code and
an arm ads or realview compiler you can make some changes. However there are still caps on aquisition dynamics etc.
SIRF have to supply you libraries to allow true high G, high dynamics. We supplied such software to military users only
after Sirf coverd the legal paperwork. Balloons only had to have peak altitude limits adjusted, this was less of an issue as they did not travel at speeds higher than say 120 knots.

Thanks for responding! (even though this was a while ago). I ended up with my tried and true Novatel which can have the limits easily removed for $1k but I am still interested on this if it's possible.

The project is for DARPA, so we could be considered "government users" to a certain extent. Do you still do this modification work?

Hi, I would ask my colleagues to supply the right firmware for the right module. It would have to be a Navman
Ss3 or Ss4 module. These are being used in mil and civil aerospace programs.You can check on navmanwirelessoem.com

They have now become part of Telit. But the LA based Navman Gps team are now the Gps core R&D for Telit.

There may be a couple of COTS receivers that will work though I share Gary's concern about high dynamics.  A couple are listed in this thread: Link  If you have access to a simulator you can test.  In my case high dynamics are most likely after balloon release.  The risk being that the reciever would loose GPS and not reaquire until the airframe is flying normally, perhaps to lower enough velocity.  The Venus GPS spec says that either limit, not both, can be violated (search SparkFun).  Another thread on this topic with more listings: link2 link3 Inventek GPS reference: Inventek.  Some anecdotal info from HAB launches exists since these payloads are travelling at relatively high velocities and spinning while either keeping GPS or reacquiring.  Some GPS position and velocity data is posted at various sites.  Hopefully this is helpful. 

RSS

Social Networking

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.

A list of all T3 contests is here

Groups

Advertisement

© 2013   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service