Xbee for full remote control
I have quite a few zigbee modules of various powers. I've used them for serial communication of environmental data and found them perfect for that. I am looking to do some sort of UAVS but I am loath to spend hundreds of Euro on a decent radio system when I have the zigbee modules.
I wonder has anyone built a full RC system for an aircraft using zigbee for comms. Components of the system would be
airborne zigbee, arduino, servos
ground zigbee, computer , software, joystick, mouse or keyboard for controller
The advantage is that no RC radio or receiver would be required, saving cost and weight, while extending range but of course the disadvantage is potential unreliability.
I wonder has anyone built a full RC system for an aircraft using zigbee for comms. Components of the system would be
airborne zigbee, arduino, servos
ground zigbee, computer , software, joystick, mouse or keyboard for controller
The advantage is that no RC radio or receiver would be required, saving cost and weight, while extending range but of course the disadvantage is potential unreliability.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Krzysztof Bosak on -
You loath to spend hundreds and want to do it by ourself?
The reason agains xbee is latency, and when you include range CRC checking etc, it will be also bandwith.
-
Permalink Reply by Diarmuid Wrenne on -
Actually they are Xbees from Maxstream not zigbee.
The thing is that I will be using the xbee for telemtry and remote updates of flight info. If I am doing that I would like to see if I can bypass the RC requirement.
How long would the latency be? Testing on the bench suggests pretty instantaneous transmission of push button events. I'll see if I can set up a desktop program to send out data with a timestamp and get the remote ardiono to reply. The maxstram dev kit comes with an echo test so maybe I'll try that.
The reason I asked is because I couldn't find any link to such a project. I was wondering what the protocol would be. These guys have a serial to servo unit. http://www.pololu.com/catalog/product/208 . A simple implementation would be just that board and an airborne zigbee with no arduino.
-
Permalink Reply by Joe Jackson on
-
I am in the middle of building that type of configuration at the moment.
Took a 3 axis joystick with throttle and ran the voltages from the internal potentiometers into a PIC16F690.
The PIC takes the joystick and trim and converts to hex.
PIC uart to XBEE900 in transparent mode.
On the RC plane I have another XBEE900 receiving in transparent mode.
The serial from the XBEE goes to the Pololu servo controller.(Mini SSC II mode)
At the moment motor and servos can be controlled .
Have got some electrical noise(motor ,servos) at the moment which sends the Pololu in the error state on occasions.It will not recovery by itself so have to reboot it.
This locks up the Pololu servo controller
-
Permalink Reply by James Turner on -
Joe, I have some code for a PIC16F628A which does a similar job as the pololu but without locking up (watchdog timer enable just in case). only thing is though is uses a different command set and only has 16 positions per servo. it was originally written by someone for a 16F887. If you want to try it I can send you the source and hex.
-
Permalink Reply by Dan Arbeider on
-
Joe, do you have any more info on your XBEE serial to pololu servo controller setup? I'm trying to do something very similar. Do you have a null modem adapter between the two?
-
Permalink Reply by Martin Seven on -
I'm also planning on building an xbee-only airborne platform next summer, with everything on a single line, incl. command uplink, telemetry and photo/video downlink. I've done a couple of trials (basically running about with an arduino that sends back 1 kB buffers it receives from a groundstation) and found out that a pair of 2 mW XBee Pro modules can maintain about 5 KB/s with decent latency (<200 ms) over 100 m (300 ft) LOS. I'm planning on using stronger ones, maybe 60 mW ones, and those are supposed to have a range over 1 km.
-
Permalink Reply by Diarmuid Wrenne on
-
Sounds good, although I think photos and video might be too much for the xbees. I think there would have to be some sort of priority given to the RC. Maybe 200 ms might be too much for effective RC control. However, since this is meant to a semi automated aircraft, may that is enough. I'd be interested in Chris's and Jordi's experience on the RC link and how much it is used after takeoff and landing. How frequently are the controls changed on an RC transmitter, 4 or 5 times per second. That would be feasible on a xbee link and still have room left over for telemetry.
-
Permalink Reply by anaximander on
-
Sounds like you're planning something similar to what I'm currently researching. My plan was to get the InputShield that's available for Arduino, and build it into a ground station of some sort. The InputShield has a nice little Playstation-style thumbstick, so with a little coding it could easily be used to fly a plane, provided you don't want to do anything too fancy. I'm still trying to work out how I'd code it all to run on an Arduino or two; I'm kinda new to Arduinos in general and I haven't quite figured out where how much they're capable of. I can think of a few more powerful systems that would be able to handle it, but I don't really want to have to buy even more kit, especially seeing how expensive some of those other systems are... Do you think an Arduino (or two; one airborne and one groundside) would be enough to handle manual control, autopilot command uplink, telemetry, photo and video downlink? Would one XBee have the bandwidth, or would it need two?
-
Permalink Reply by James F. on
-
How do you plan on getting video back on a single line? XBee's can't handle that kind of bandwidth...Video can be 2+ mbps and an xbee is only 15kbps!
-
3D RoboticsPermalink Reply by Chris Anderson on -
Jack Crossfire has done some testing with them for applications like this. Latency and reliability were indeed issues. See his comments here, for example.
-
Permalink Reply by Thomas Saunders on
-
I've been trying to implement my own RC system using a couple of arduinos and some APC220-43 RF units. The actual modules themselves are pretty easy to use, but they are just too high latency for RC stuff - a quick test showed 120ms for 8 bytes, ~130ms for 16byte packet, 180ms for 32byte. So now I'm going to look into XBees as those results seem a lot more promising!
-
Permalink Reply by James Turner on
-
Personally I would advise against using the pololu product for this application. I bought the exact same model when I set out to do a similar project and found out that the unit has been designed to lockup and need a hardware reset in the event of any incorrect serial data which is likely to happen at some point when using wireless products. This will certainly be a problem for an rc plane and I don't remember them mentioning this on the website. The only solution I found at the time was to build my own which simply ignored anything that wasn't valid servo data. I tend to get the plane in the air using a standard receiver then switch to Xbee and reverse for landing, latency doesn't seem to be a problem for gentle flight. GCS transmits 5 single byte servo positions every 100ms.
Social Networking
Top Content
Contests
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.A list of all T3 contests is here.
Groups
-
ArduRover User Group
183 members
-
ArduCopter User Group
1278 members
-
Andropilot Users Group
182 members
-
Moderators
24 members
-
Documentation Editors
51 members
Advertisement
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by
