There may be a mistake in calculation of inertial navigation.This issue I've posted on ardupilot.com forum on APM:Copter>>3.1, but so far there is still no replies, so I post it again here with…Continue
"Hi Hafidz! Any updates on your findings? I am also working in an institution that works on UAVs and we have a project on Ardupilot. I was wondering if you have finished understanding the whole Ardupilot code and maybe you could share some of your…"
I have the same issue. I have a pixhawk board, I could upload AC3.2 firmware but then I can't connect the board to the mission planner. I tried different things: connect/disconnect GPS/compass modul, tried on different USB port, even…"
"Thank you for sharing your findings... I am now also in the initial process of understanding the whole Ardupilot codes... I will share my findings as well though I cannot give an explicit date for that. Right now I am interning at a company that…"
"In that commit I don't see the fix for correct_with_baro(). In the commit we've checked if buffer if buffer is full then get the delayed sample at the front, otherwise get the current sample. If the buffer is not full it's true that…"
"IMO for the cyclic buffer with the number of samples = size = 15, the delay is 15 samples, so if now we get the baro data, it means that the inertial calculation for that data was 15 samples ago, or it should be at the beginning of the buffer, the…"
"Hmm, really? I heard a similar report (perhaps the opposite) in AC3.0.1 from neurocopter and we fixed it for AC3.1.
Of course it's possible that it was correct for AC3.0.1, neurocopter was wrong and I agreed with him and made it…"