Syed Murtaza Jaffar
  • Male
  • Montreal, QC
  • Canada
Share Twitter
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Syed Murtaza Jaffar's Friends

  • Dr Mike Black
  • William Premerlani
  • Chris Anderson
 

Syed Murtaza Jaffar's Page

Latest Activity

Syed Murtaza Jaffar left a comment for William Premerlani
"Thanks a ton William. Will follow suit. Very useful information you provided. Will keep you in the loop as time rolls by. Have a great day. Best wishes and sincere regards. Syed"
Mar 31, 2010
William Premerlani left a comment for Syed Murtaza Jaffar
"Hi Syed, Regarding your question about a UAV DevBoard or an ArduPilot board, there was a recent discussion. So, you should start by looking here. One of the issues you will want to consider is vibration. Neither the LISY gyros used on the UAV…"
Mar 31, 2010
Syed Murtaza Jaffar commented on William Premerlani's blog post UAV v2 development board is back in stock
"Hello Bill. Which one is a better option for developing an autopilot for a UAV. Your Dev board or Chris's Ardupilot. I need to start complete autopilot development (as an amateur) for a quadrotor and would like to know which one is the BEST…"
Mar 31, 2010

Profile Information

About Me:
An amateur with a passion for designing control systems for UAvs
Hometown:
Cornwall

Comment Wall (1 comment)

At 6:35pm on March 31, 2010, William Premerlani said…
Hi Syed,

Regarding your question about a UAV DevBoard or an ArduPilot board, there was a recent discussion. So, you should start by looking here.

One of the issues you will want to consider is vibration. Neither the LISY gyros used on the UAV DevBoard, nor the gyros used on the ArduIMU, are very resistant to vibration, which means that you need to mount them to resist vibration.

We have done some recent tests on a prototype for the next version of the UDB, which will use Invensense gyros that are highly resistant to vibration, and will probably be available in several months.

Both the UDB and the Ardupilot use the same "direction cosine matrix" (DCM) algorithm to combine all sources of attitude information into an attitude estimate.

Some work that Paul Bizard has done has shown that the DCM algorithm requires much less processing than Kalman filtering. For more information on the DCM algorithm, refer to a summary that Paul Bizard and I wrote, and some papers that Robert Mahoney wrote.

Regarding accuracy, GPS is not suited for indoor use, or small spaces. The accuracy is on the order of 10 meters. There are issues of both location bias and noise. You can do some filtering techniques and something I call "dead reckoning" to deal with the noise, but there is no easy way to deal with bias.

Regarding processing power, I cannot comment only on the UDB.

We are presently running it at 16 MHz, but we have a software option to run it at 120 MHz, so I think there is plenty of processing power.

For more information about applying the UDB to helicopters, take a look at the discussions of the uavheliboard group in google groups.

Best regards,
Bill

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

 
 
 

Social Networking

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.

A list of all T3 contests is here

Advertisement

© 2013   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service