Comment by Jay Smith on March 13, 2010 at 6:34pm

The mass of the T tail could be give a torque problem on a hard landing, Have you given any thought to a lower version?

Comment by tycinis on March 14, 2010 at 2:31pm

Some plane are in stock with descent price :

http://www.fpvhobby.com/6-fpv-airplane

Comment by UFO-MAN on March 17, 2010 at 11:11am

Looks like this may be a nice FPV plane. One benefit of a T tail like that is that the horizontal stabilizer surface are further removed from the grass if you land on grass (all my landings are on grass). This may prevent damage to the control surfaces since grass is less stiff on top than on the bottom of the straws. It is also less dense. However as Jay points out, making the T-tail stiff will probably add to the mass. This may in turn lead to more force exerted on the rear mass of the aircraft when the body is rapidly decelerated as it is in hard a landing.

A comment from my side would be about the wing design. It looks like the wing design has no dihedral designed in. Would not that lack of dihedral make no Dihedral effect (the amount of roll moment produced per degree of sideslip) so that the tail rudder is less effective for bank control? Also the roll stability would be lower, making aileron corrections necessary?

Another comment would be that a good size hatch should be designed in on top of the fuselage so that there is good access to the electronics from above! Few of the designs I have seen so far adress that. This is a very important feature for experimenters like me. I dont like to rip out all the wiring and boards since I then have to carefully stuff everything back inside before flying. This takes a lot of time on the strip and often causes problems due to omissions or missed connects, loose connectors etc.

Is the designer of the aircraft reading this forum?

UFO_MAN

Comment by Morli_ on March 17, 2010 at 2:27pm

you have to probably fab the hatch yourself i guess

Comment by UFO-MAN on March 18, 2010 at 2:01am

It would be good if the hatch was already designed in from the factory. For example one hatch under the wing (reinforced) and one in the front of the plane. This one of my issues with the RTF models: difficult access to electronics in the field.

UFO_MAN

Moderator Comment by Hooks on March 18, 2010 at 2:42am

When a copy made in glassfiber is ready I gess there will be hatches just where you need it :-)

Comment by UFO-MAN on March 18, 2010 at 2:43am

Wouldnt glassfiber be too heavy?

Moderator Comment by Hooks on April 15, 2010 at 10:46pm

Skywalker are now in a new version made of stronger EPO foam.

Se more here on the Skywalker EPO platform

Comment by Dan Smithson on May 19, 2010 at 6:34am

I am just about ready to put my ardu hardware in a plane...Is the concensus, that the Skywalker is better than the Easystar.... I want the best route...thanks....

Comment by iw28 on May 19, 2010 at 2:27pm

Dan Smithson
What I have heard that the Skywalker should be the best FPV UAV platform. and very easy to transport, can carry many equipments, more crash resist, and is bigger than the easystar and will fly safer, longer and higher, should also be very recommended.

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page