Comment by apocolipse on October 24, 2011 at 11:23pm

Wouldn't you need a Pusher specific variant of this?  Looks like you'd need to either manually flip the props and make separate/new housings, or get a whole different version, the one pictured is a puller.

Distributor Comment by RC Tech.se on October 25, 2011 at 12:21am

I don't know why, but i must have one. :-) Maybe because of the sheer looks of it...

Distributor Comment by Martint BuildYourOwnDrone.co.uk on October 25, 2011 at 1:00am

Now if they would just release an ArduCopter version.................:)

 

Regards

 

Martin

Comment by Ravi on October 25, 2011 at 3:14am

i think you can easily flip the props for using as pusher prop version. the spinners would take the flipped props. i have tried it on a normal spinner of the same size.  in the pic below is example of flipped prop in a normal spinner which i am flying.

Comment by Sebastian on October 25, 2011 at 7:10am

I bought this motor about a year ago for a scratch built plane. It gave it a nice look worked well enough for what I wanted but the quality was a little lacking. The biggest issue were the small gauge wires that eventually just broke. They almost seemed to small for the current running through them. Just a heads up.

 

However, even with its faults it was enjoyable to see it run. :)

Comment by Kazuyuki on October 25, 2011 at 7:10am

I use about a year ago.
There is no reactionary torque.
Is my favorite.

Comment by Scott Plunkett on October 25, 2011 at 7:38am

Looks fun, I would love to see the real world performance specs when you get it tested!

Comment by Daniel Hibben on October 25, 2011 at 6:19pm

i like this motor but the website does not say if it needs 1 or two ESC's i am assuming it needs two,  but can anyone confirm this for me?

Comment by Ravi on October 26, 2011 at 12:44am

It needs only one ESC. both the motors are internally wired so that they both rotate in opposite direction with one ESC. i think a simple but a brilliant idea by the designer.

Comment by Daniel Hibben on October 26, 2011 at 7:55am

very cool, very cool

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page