I've been playing with ArduPlane for quite a while and have finally got to the point where I can make it do something useful. I've been inspired by others on this site to use it for aerial photography to make 3D maps and the like.
I have an ST Models Discovery as the airframe (awesome platform for Arduplane by the way) and have made my own camera mount out of plywood for the bottom. It has one servo for roll stabilisation using CHAN 8 on the autopilot to keep the camera pointing down. It's basic but works pretty well (see pics)
Last weekend I flew over a small island on the river near my house. I managed to get 155 photos in around 10 mins and produce quite a reasonable 3d surface using hypr3d. I gotta say that these guys rock with great personal service and it's all free! They did struggle a bit with that many photos, but you can see the result below
I'm not in the same league as some of the other makers of aerial maps on this site, and have no idea of the accuracy of this map, but was pretty happy with the early results and would like to work on this more to get better results.
my setup is
Airframe - ST Models Discovery Trainer with stock motor and 30A ESC
Arduplane 2.24 with Magnetometer, airspeed kit and xbee - a few lines of code added to output roll stabilisation
Home made camera mount with roll stabiliser
Canon IXUS 50 camera 5MP (this is a very light P&S camera) running CHDK
Spektrum DX 7 2.4GHz tx/rx
2200 mAh 3s motor battery + 1000 mAh 2s battery to power all other electronics via a UBEC (the stock BEC is too small)
I used Mark Willis's aerial coverage spreadsheet to calculate the waypoints before launch and it seemed to produce a good result.You can see the waypoint in the following screenshot

Cheers
James
Comment by Martin Poller on November 1, 2011 at 8:36am The spreadsheet is here, http://diydrones.com/forum/attachment/download?id=705844%3AUploaded..., it's very good too.
thanx for your help.
Comment by Nick Sargeant on November 1, 2011 at 9:18am Nice James. Good to see that you're in the air.
You'll have to come to a Perth FPV meetup and show off your kit :D
Comment by chet walker on November 1, 2011 at 9:57am excellent work! This really looks great.
Nice job!
Could you explain how to generate the WP from the spreadsheet? I could not understand how it works.
Comment by Tom Milnes on November 1, 2011 at 12:30pm Hey everyone, I'm Tom, the CTO of Hypr3D.com. Just want to say "Thank You!" to James for the excellent use of our service. For others who are interested, the ideal overlap between images is about 1/2 an image above, below, left and right. That way any given point on the ground is seen in about 5 images. This allows a strong model to be built in a reasonable amount of time. Less overlap results in spotty results, and more overlap limits the amount of area that can be covered by a flight. We're happy to work with Michael & Martin to further develop the planning algorithm for optimal coverage and timing! Again, James, awesome work!
Comment by Kirill on November 1, 2011 at 1:45pm Good job, James! Thanks for sharing!
I did the same with my plane, camera and APM this summer. It's great!
Comment by Alex Funi on November 1, 2011 at 3:11pm Martin,
CHDK is very easy to set up a trigger with a voltage pulse on the cameras USB. Just hook this into your APM relay.
Comment by Tom Milnes on November 1, 2011 at 4:14pm DIYDroner Jeff Taylor just sent me a thoughtful note about Hypr3D. His questions were really good ones so I'm re-posting them here in case there are others who are interested. Thanks again to Jeff for getting in touch!
"How many images should be used for a reconstruction?" Generally speaking, 30 images is sufficient for a good model. If you're covering a VERY large area then you may want as many as 75, but this is unusual. Once you have enough overlap for each point on the ground to be visible in 4-5 images, then adding more images doesn't help the reconstruction. Our software will still try to incorporate the extra images, but the only effect is that you'll have to wait (much) longer for your model to be ready.
"Does Hypr3D work with wide-angle cameras like the GoPro?" Yes, we have built a model or two with a GoPro camera. That said, the distortion caused by the wide-angle inexpensive lenses doesn't contribute to a strong reconstruction. A quality point-and-shoot (even a small one like James' Canon IXUS 50), is generally a better choice. DSLRs are the nuclear solution, but are overkill in many cases.
"Why is this service free?" Well, that's a good question. It's free for now because we're just getting started and we love seeing what people do with the technology. But hosting, development and processing are expensive, and get progressively more so as new users join. We're trying to understand what the best avenues are for generating sustainable revenue while allowing the most people access to this fun technology. Maybe in the beginning this means advertising revenue. Maybe it means pay-for-3D-printing. We're not sure but we're working on it. We welcome with open arms your thoughts and suggestions!
Cheers,
Tom
CTO, Hypr3D.com
I just chucked some pictures I had hanging around to see how this service compared to photosynth and I am impressed.
Heres the model https://www.hypr3d.com/models/4eb0662b01b5a3000100001c
and in Photosynth http://photosynth.net/view.aspx?cid=df2bf33c-c817-4bbf-9a53-8f93659...
It only used half the images I added but then I did'nt select them in any way. I have another little project that I would like to try next in hypr3D before trying the 15km of river that I have images of!
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.1299 members
48 members
693 members
51 members
249 members
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!
Join DIY Drones