New meaning for the phrase "Don't Mess With Texas;" Texas Sheriff's office receives weaponizable drone, alarms local news station

Saw this on the news, and then read about it today on engadget as well.  Interesting points - 50 pound chopper, to be used primarily for surveillance, but also weapons capable.  Local 2 News has a tendency to blow things out of proportion, and they clearly wanted to sensationalize this, but the technology does raise some interesting privacy issues that may need to be addressed in the long run.  Is an individual invading someones privacy if they capture video of activities that might otherwise be private??

Views: 1340

Comment by basshead on November 4, 2011 at 3:22am

This is ridiculous, how far above my house do my rights to airspace extend? Anyone know?

Comment by Michael Zaffuto on November 4, 2011 at 3:56am

Approximately 550 nanometers (One measureable wavelength of green light) would be my guess.


Moderator
Comment by Gary Mortimer on November 4, 2011 at 4:41am

@basshead I don't believe you have any rights to airspace above your house!

 

As has been said, the gap between marketing and reality is as ever huge. Your right the media love stories like this, I do at sUAS News it makes the counter go nuts!!

 

Still very much a snake oil filled market place. 

 

Comment by Michael Pursifull on November 4, 2011 at 5:17am

"only so much of the airspace above their property as they may reasonably use in connection with their enjoyment of the underlying land"

 

See United States v. Causby

 

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_rights

Comment by Scott Plunkett on November 4, 2011 at 6:24am

@basshead / Mike- Even at that, they don't need to be ABOVE my property (air rights extend vertically from the perimeter of one's land) to see what is going on ON my property.  How many of us live in areas where we can see what is going on in our neighbors back yard from a second or third story window?  I think this would be similar.

Comment by Anish on November 8, 2011 at 6:55pm

with my limited knowledge of legal precidence in USA. This is what i came across

"Supreme Court, in Kyllo v. United States addressed privacy implications of monitoring electrical use in the home. (Search warrant needed for Thermal Imaging)"

Comment by Martin Szymanski on November 8, 2011 at 9:12pm

There has been legal interpretations of the vertical property rules. I wonder if the moon as it swept over allowed me its real estates ;-)

Comment by Macboffin on November 10, 2011 at 5:23pm

Ref the Police quad in the river;I think not mechanical or electronics failure, nor pilot error,: after two years failing to get CAA permission to operate they dropped it in the river for the insurance. (If they had asked CAA before using over that pop concert event they might have been dealt with more favourably).

Demonstrated a mini uav to police some years back, they didnt want to hear about legalities, "We are the Police!"

      

Comment

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

Social Networking

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.

A list of all T3 contests is here

Advertisement

© 2013   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service