I wanted to bring everyone up to date on where the ESC32 development is at this point. After a lot of testing of the version 1 design, we found that operating under high current situations, current spikes caused by commutation were introducing a lot of noise on the digital side of things. In the worse cases, this could lead to clocking issues causing the MCU to reset or worse, lock up. Of course if that happens you will likely cook a motor.
So, back to the drawing board (CAD actually). After a lot of trial and error, I came up with the version 2 design. It manages to keep the high current paths much shorter and thicker as well as keeping the analog and digital ground planes completely separate. This new approach is now working quite well with as much current as the FETs will handle. I took this re-design opportunity to add CAN Bus support with an optional CAN transceiver chip onboard. Additionally an external shunt resistor was added to improve the accuracy of current measurements over the original internal PCB trace shunt. All of this without loosing any prior interfaces or functionality.
During the same time a lot of work went into improving the firmware's operation and adding new features.
The CLI has been expanded and gives you access to all tunable parameters via the UART port. There is also a binary protocol for high speed machine to machine communications up to 921600 baud. And now Dallas Semiconductor's 1-wire protocol is supported over the PWM IN port. This means that the flight controller can bi-directionally communicate with the ESC over the existing PWM IN lines. This can be useful for setting run modes and parameters pre-flight or downloading operational data post-flight. Anytime the ESC is not in the run state, communications can take place. There is a future opportunity to allow firmware updates over the 1-wire protocol as well.
Closed loop RPM mode has been implemented. The idea is that the throttle maps to RPM directly in a linear fashion and the ESC works to achieve and maintain the requested RPM with a closed loop controller onboard running at 1KHz. The ESC utilizes a feed forward augmented PI controller to get you to the requested set point as quickly as possible but still remaining within the set current limit. There is also an experimental regenerative braking feature which takes excess motor speed and turns it into current flowing back into the battery. Closed loop mode can be very useful when implementing advanced predictive attitude controllers on the FC which will require consistent, predictable performance from the motors.
Another interesting feature is what I call the virtual current limiter. The problem with a lot of hobby ESCs is that they have to be careful of how much current they allow the motor to draw during acceleration events. Most of them use some sort of throttle filtering or smoothing to limit the throttle increases allowed at each time step. The amount of current drawn by the motor depends on the motor's size, RPM and prop load which is not known by the ESC and most do not have a current sensor. Since there is no way to know how much is too much, they have to settle on a conservative approach to avoid frying motors or FETs. This will ultimately limit the throttle response to something less than optimal and for multi-rotors, this is undesirable.
My solution to this problem was to give the user a way to profile the motor and prop being used on the bench. This data can also be looked up from a database that is being compiled of known motor/prop configurations. With this information, the onboard current limiter can pre-calculate how much current a given throttle (voltage) request will take at the current RPM, and if it would result in an over current situation, the implemented throttle request is trimmed to fit under the limit. As the motor speeds up, the current demand drops even if the requested throttle has not changed so the limit is re-evaluated at 1KHz trying to give the maximum amount of acceleration possible with the given restrictions. The results are the fastest throttle response possible while staying under the set current limit. Finally, if the profiling parameters have not yet been set, a regular PI controller is used to limit current. It is still better than throttle filtering methods, but not as good as the virtual current limiter as it is a reactionary strategy.
There are now also a lot of tunable parameters which allow the ESC to be used for non-standard applications. For instance, if you are using PWM IN for control, you can design custom parameters for the pulse width and waveform period. Current limits, start voltages, PWM output frequency many other settings can be made from the CLI, binary or 1-wire interfaces and stored in flash memory for future power ups.
I'm sure the first question will be how much current can they handle. The truth is I don't really know. According to their data sheet, the FETs are capable of 160A continuous. As a practical matter, there is no way you could come close to dissipating the amount of heat that would be generated at those levels. With large heat sinks you could probably run them over 50A continuous, but without any heat sinks the limit will be significantly less. In the end, the limiting factor is simply cooling. If you can get them into some prop wash or rig some sort of small heat sink your results will improve. I've been flying them for for more than 6 months with no heat sink at all, but my machines typically weigh less than 3Kg. As we get more test data in we will be better able to characterize the actual limits.
I'd like to thank all of the people who have helped test and even blown up motors to make this ESC possible.
ESC32 v2 specifications and features:
- STM32F103 72MHz 32bit ARM
- All N-FET design with gate drivers
- 2S through 5S battery voltage
- Option to power logic side via UART or PWM IN +5v
- CAN transceiver hardware support onboard
- Firmware written completely in C
- ARM Cortex SWD connector pads for real-time debugging
- Communications ports: PWM IN / UART / I2C / CAN Bus
- Communications protocols: PWM IN / CLI / binary / 1-wire / I2C** / CAN**
- 4KHz to 64KHz PWM out
- Current sensing / limiting with real shunt resistor
- Closed loop control modes
- Virtual current limiter
- Regenerative braking (experimental)
- Lot of available RAM / FLASH for experimentation and development
* rendering by Max Levine
** I2C and CAN drivers have not yet been written
Finally I have decided to release the source code under an open source license. Hopefully talented individuals will be able to help design new features and functions that everyone can use:
Comment by Bill Nesbitt on June 26, 2012 at 1:04pm Jeroen: That might explain your problem. At 40KHz your ZC detection resolution is only 25us.
My technique is something I cooked up. The only documentation is the source code itself. My effective resolution is around 6.7us independent of the PWM out frequency. The limiting factor is the ADC and system clock speeds. Still a little high, but it does give enough time to be able to vary the advance.
Comment by Jeroen van de Mortel on June 26, 2012 at 1:54pm That is correct with the 25us. But when do you sample the BEMF, it is then not synchronous to the PWM. So the sample can be during the ON time or OFF time of the PWM. If I understand correct.
Comment by Bill Nesbitt on June 26, 2012 at 2:05pm Correct, the sampling is asynchronous to the output PWM. Since all three channels are sampled at the same time and averaged, the ZC point will be the same whether they are being driven high or not. All terms have the same corruption of the output waveform so they cancel each other out.
Comment by Jeroen van de Mortel on June 26, 2012 at 11:58pm That sounds quiet good, so you continously sample all the three channels at 149kHz and then average them. And then compare the floating phase to halve the other two phases that are driven.
That also explains the 15 degrees advance commutation because the averaging cause phase delay, but it is constant. Unlike normal RC filters that are used in standard ESC's.
With my algorithm I don't have to use filters, the only disadvantage is that the resolution is limited.
What kinde of settling times do you get with your PI controller for example from 2000Rpm to 4000rpm
Comment by Bill Nesbitt on June 27, 2012 at 5:23am As you said, the actual ZC time can be calculated by taking the current time and subtracting (the filter window size / 2). Any advance is applied to the actual crossing time, not the at time it is detected. 15 deg is an actual number.
The closed loop PI controller can be tuned by the user. The actual settling time will depend on the motor, prop, current RPM and tuning of the PI controller. If you can stand a small amount of overshoot and a big spike in current, a large jump can happen around 20us to 30us.
Comment by Jeroen van de Mortel on June 27, 2012 at 5:37am I think I understand now.
20us is realy fast, I get around 60ms with 10inch props and 110watt motor. I also saw OpenESC which is around 20ms. Are you sure 20/30us settling time ? must be very small prop or no prop and powerfull motor.
Comment by Bill Nesbitt on June 27, 2012 at 6:11am Typo - I of course meant 20 to 30ms.
Comment by Jeroen van de Mortel on June 27, 2012 at 6:17am Haha I thought so, thank you for the info. When I have time I will try to read your code.
Comment by Roy Brewer on June 27, 2012 at 10:48pm Bill,
Now I see what you meant by "some interesting developments this weekend" :-)
Have you considered direct current control, instead of RPM control? What the flight controller cares about is thrust and torque, which should be proportional to current. Thrust and torque are quadratic functions of RPM.
- Roy
Comment by Bill Nesbitt on June 28, 2012 at 2:56am Yes, a closed loop thrust mode has been planed for - linearizing thrust instead of RPM. As soon as I get some free time I will implement it. It should be easy as I have all of the required pieces lined up.
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.51 members
24 members
691 members
185 members
130 members
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!
Join DIY Drones