Folding vs. Non-Folding Prop Testing

 

 

For my next airplane I'm planning on using a folding prop to reduce damage during landings (as my motor is mounted on the nose). The folding prop looked smaller (the actual blade-moving air portion) and I was also a little concerned about the folding blades becoming unbalanced or not fully extending.

 

I decided to throw three different kinds of props on my motor testing tower and find out what their performance really was. I tested them for amps consumed, watts required, airspeed (at about 1 ft. away from the prop) and of course, thrust.

 

The folding prop did just fine, and at least matched the performance of the others. I have no hesitation of using on my MTP3.

 

Final details:

3689420748?profile=originalBlades: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXZL07&P=7

Hub: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXZL06&P=M

 

 

3689420593?profile=originalNot this exact prop, but very much like it: http://www.hobby-lobby.com/8x5_prop_359_prd1.htm?pSearchQueryId=1749700

 

 

3689420859?profile=originalProp from HK: http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/store/__5437__APC_style_propeller_8x4_E.html

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones