Hawaii state DOT admits mistake with unusable $75,000 drone aircraft

Anyone know whose drone this is? It must have a fancy camera for $75k.

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/17369971/exclusive-state-dot-adm...

excerpt:

The state Department of Transportation's Harbors Division has been unable to use an unmanned drone aircraft purchased with $75,000 in federal grant money to provide security at Honolulu Harbor because it falls within restricted airspace near Honolulu International Airport.

Views: 2199

Comment by Ellison Chan on April 11, 2012 at 3:00pm

That's one huge prop.  I like the design of the camera in the front like that.

Comment by Christian - CheapDrones.com on April 11, 2012 at 3:28pm

Yeah, I like the look of it, I would imagine you need to catch this thing, or fly it into a net, I wouldnt want to land it on the ground the way its set up.  A good looking drone no doubt.

Comment by IKE on April 11, 2012 at 5:36pm

This look similar (but not exactly the same) to Skylark UAV from Elbit

Comment by Jan Detlefsen on April 12, 2012 at 2:57am

can't fly it? so give it to the local (public) university. at least that not all the money wasted.

Comment by Paul Marsh on April 12, 2012 at 4:19am

Out of a $1.4 million grant, $75,000 amounts to 0.05%.  The only reason this is news is because a drone is involved.  Can you imagine if every time 0.05% of tax money is wasted we got a news story?

Comment by Obormot on April 12, 2012 at 4:33am

as i understood, a drone was crushed and thats why drone can't be used anymore :)

nothing about "not working", "buggy software" or "bad construction".


"because it falls within restricted airspace near Honolulu International Airport"

Comment by R. D. Starwalt on April 12, 2012 at 4:40am

Regarding the aircraft, it looks like the camera/link module was developed separately and the flying surfaces added later. The wing 'pylon' is attached to a saddle that is fastened to the camera/link module. In the article, a photo from the right rear side shows most of the flying surfaces.

Some aspects remind me of a Free Flight C class model...except that massive motor/prop. Wow.

I also wonder if it was part of an option for the entire surveilance system?

The vendor/OEM could have developed the camera/link modules and then just bolted the flying stuff on.

Comment by R. D. Starwalt on April 12, 2012 at 4:44am

Here's the vendor mentioned in the article... http://www.hawaiyatech.com/

'Under Construction' so... FWIW

Comment by R. D. Starwalt on April 12, 2012 at 5:17am

Ok, I am going to stop with this.. I hope.

Here is another article about the same company, drone focused, and the awarded project.. http://www.suasnews.com/2011/01/3607/now-drones-for-hawaii-coastline/

The vendor has a subsection on the net that is still live..http://www.hawaiyatech.com/seaporte.html

I shouldn't have enjoyed Lisbeth's character so much...investigative linking is addictive when results are obtained.

Comment by Ellison Chan on April 12, 2012 at 9:09am

Paul, if there was a high profile news story every time 0.05% of money was wasted, there would less wasting of money.  People in government, spending our money, would think twice about doing stupid things.  The people a the DOT need to be removed from fiscal decisions and if any corruption is found they should be fired.

Comment

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

Social Networking

Contests

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.

A list of all T3 contests is here

Groups

Advertisement

© 2013   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service