Comment by Paul Mather on February 11, 2011 at 2:43pm

Fast forward to the 22 minute mark.

Comment by mquintilian on February 11, 2011 at 3:22pm

what horrible cgi and a  horrible quad copter

Comment by David on February 11, 2011 at 3:37pm

At least they realized that you might loose signal in a tunnel :)

Comment by mquintilian on February 11, 2011 at 4:18pm

did you see the tunnel it's tiny. but the video gave me an idea, would the backfire on a gun cause the quad it to flip.

Comment by Paul Mather on February 11, 2011 at 4:34pm

Good thing going around the corner of those buildings had no effect on the signal....

Comment by Ron Jacobs on February 11, 2011 at 5:22pm

The gun on the quad would get you arrested. Not to mention break a few AMA and I think even FAA "regulations", although bullets aren't projectiles that burn or explode are they? You'd probably get a firearms violation or something though right? ;)

Comment by Ron Jacobs on February 11, 2011 at 5:30pm

Interesting design for a quad though, you could belly land that anywhere, maybe. Would that design work?

 

Comment by Hamish on February 11, 2011 at 8:51pm

missed them both! should've used arducopter

Comment by Hamish on February 11, 2011 at 9:27pm

@mquintilian

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59ttSwYNspw

prolly won't flip

Comment by Rory Paul on February 11, 2011 at 9:52pm

Guys "armed" (smoke, baton, tazer)  sUAS for civilian security applications are in development and I understand being evaluated by at least one Canadian police department:

 

http://vanguarddefense.com/public-safety/law-enforcement/

 

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page