UAV projects at MAKS-2011

3689421032?profile=original

This blog post contains photos and small descriptions of UAV projects, presented at MAKS-2011. Mainly, teams use commercial autopilots, however some of them had very nice their own built systems.
However, the prices are sufficently high, usually starts from $30,000. I had a talk with representatives of a few different projects and almost all of them said that clients usually prefer to get service (aerial photography or video) rather than buy UAV. Anyway, here is a small photo report:

 

3689421116?profile=original3689421158?profile=original3689421183?profile=original

 

Guys develop multirotors of different sizes and types based on MikroKopter system

3689421132?profile=original

Tiny quadcopter

3689421096?profile=original

Really tiny...

3689421208?profile=original3689421265?profile=original

This one has even weapons

3689421223?profile=original

UAV for aerial photography

3689421147?profile=original3689421248?profile=original

This project I liked more than others

3689421323?profile=original

Aerial photography mission planning

3689421373?profile=original

And very cool multifunctional ground station! We definitely need to make something like this for APM :)

3689421398?profile=original

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Admin

    Yes Kirill. Thanks for posting. I wish I can visit few of these. Have fun, and post please where ever you can.

  • I think so, Morli. It's a good way to be known what's going on in UAVs world. I make such blog posts about every similar events I visit.

  • Admin

    thanks kirill.  We need more of such photo blogs to keep the juices flowing

  • Alexander, I tried to find it there but couldn't. I have already seen it at UVS-2011, which was in March.

  • haven't seen dozor-100?
  • Great Kirill!!!!   ;)

  • Siberean Federal Institute seems to make cool things. And there is something for a chute also written on the display :-)

This reply was deleted.