APM 2.6 or 2.5, which to buy?

Hi,

I'm looking at buying an APM for a fixed-wing initially, but with the intention to use it on a quad at some point in the future.

From what I understand, the only difference between the two versions is the removal of the onboard magnetometer from the 2.6 board. I want to buy the most up to date and capable autopilot, not a legacy version.

I'm confused because the APM 2.5 appears to have a bridge point for disabling the onboard magnetometer, so why release a whole new board to achieve what is already achievable on the 2.5 with a bit of solder? If I bought a 2.5 and bridged-out the mag, can I still connect the 3DR GPS uBlox LEA-6 + Compass module?

Other than the stated reasons for having an off-board compass are there any other advantages to having the uBlox+compass over the mediaTek+onboard compass?

Cheers

dy

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • How do you identify a 2.6 board from a 2.5 board? is there some marking on it, or is it as simple as a mark thru the old onboard compass? thanks in advance

  • Developer
    Its been discovered that on Multi-rotors we cannot compensate for the magnetometer interference in software. This compensation has been more successful in ArduPlane.

    The removal of the mag is the only difference, once the magnetometer is disabled you can connect an external one.

    Not populating the mag onboard keeps costs down.
This reply was deleted.

Activity

Hiroki Tanaka liked Hiroki Tanaka's profile
Oct 13
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: The US government just approved 5 US-made drones for purchase, all based on the @Dronecode @PX4Autopilot standard. Great news f…
Aug 20
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @MarvelmindMaxim: Extreme precision for 60 swarming robots. #marvelmind #autonomousrobotics #robotics #swarmrobotics #rtls #ips #indoor…
Aug 3
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @MarvelmindMaxim: Precise (±2cm) tracking for racing boats and autonomous boats. Works outdoor and indoor. #autonomous #AutonomousVehic…
Aug 3
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @MarvelmindMaxim: Helping PixHawk folks to fly autonomous quadcopters using PX4 and ArduPilot. https://marvelmind.com/drones/ Equally suitab…
Aug 3
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @davsca1: Here is the video of the performance. This paper was a huge group effort and more than one year of work, where we combined and…
Jul 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: My talk on PX4 and FAA certification is coming up at 1:45 PST today on the PX4 Dev Summit livestream. Includes some cool new st…
Jul 7
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @seesharp: I'm tuned into the PX4 / Dronecode free live conference. Great stuff. Microsoft AirSim talk in 10 minutes. https://t.co/0zbZ2…
Jul 6
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Here's today's best times in the @DIYRobocars/@donkey_car virtual race of AI cars compared to last month's race on the same tra…
Jun 20
DIY Drones via Twitter
Jun 19
DIY Drones via Twitter
The difference between proper RC cars and toys (when you’re turning them into robots) https://ift.tt/2MUTvxd
Jun 14
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @Struktur3D: We have just posted on @DIYDrones for the first time in a long time. Continuing with our search for a #lasercutting service…
Jun 5
DIY Drones via Twitter
Review of the new Nivida Jetson NX for robocars https://ift.tt/36TrS0G
Jun 2
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Somehow I missed this, but last week @Nvidia released a new version of its Isaac robot development framework. Lots of new Lidar…
May 31
DIY Drones via Twitter
Welcome to the new DIY Drones design!. You may have noticed that DIY Drones looks a little different today. That's… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265714415137153024
May 27
DIY Drones via Twitter
New! Online Training on Drones for Disaster Response https://ift.tt/3ehdHoT
May 26
More…