Warning #1: an issue has been found with Tower's Pause button which can cause the vehicle to fly to an old position if the vehicle has not sent a position update to Tower in some time.
Warning #2: Copter-3.3.2 fixes a bug found in Copter-3.3.1's desired climb rate initialisation which could lead to a sudden momentary drop when switching from Stabilize or Acro to AltHold, Loiter or PosHold.
Warning #3: Copter-3.3.2 fixes an issue found in Copter-3.3.1 which could lead to hard landings in RTL or AUTO if the WPNAV_SPEED_DN was set too high (i.e. >400 or 4m/s) and/or the WPNAV_ACCEL_Z was set too low (i.e. <100 or 1m/s/s).
Warning #4: a bug was found in Copter-3.3 which could cause a sudden crash if you abort a Take-off initiated from a ground station. Video description is here. The bug is fixed in Copter-3.3.1 so we recommend upgrading.
Note #1: AC3.3-rc8 corrected a long standing bug in the HDOP reporting. HDOP values will appear about 40% lower than previously but this does not actually mean the GPS position is better than before.
Note #2: if upgrading from AC3.2.1 the vehicle's accelerometer calibration needs to be done again.
Note #3: set SERIAL2_PROTOCOL to "3" and reboot the board to enable FrSky telemetry like in previous versions.
Note #4: the wiki will be updated over the next few weeks to explain how to use the new features
Copter-3.3.1 is available through the mission planner. The full list of changes vs AC3.2.1 can be see in the ReleaseNotes and below are the most recent changes since AC3.3.
Sadly this version (and all future versions) will not run on the APM2.x boards due to CPU speed, flash and RAM restrictions.
Changes from 3.3:
1) Bug fix to prevent potential crash if Follow-Me is used after an aborted takeoff
2) compiler upgraded to 4.9.3 (runs slightly faster than 4.7.2 which was used previously)
Changes from 3.3-rc11:
1) EKF recovers from pre-arm "Compass variance" failure if compasses are consistent
Changes from 3.3-rc10:
1) PreArm "Need 3D Fix" message replaced with detailed reason from EKF
Changes from 3.3-rc9
1) EKF improvements:
a) simpler optical flow takeoff check
2) Bug Fixes/Minor enhancements:
a) fix INS3_USE parameter eeprom location
b) fix SToRM32 serial protocol driver to work with recent versions
c) increase motor pwm->thrust conversion (aka MOT_THST_EXPO) to 0.65 (was 0.50)
d) Firmware version sent to GCS in AUTOPILOT_VERSION message
a) pre-arm check of compass variance if arming in Loiter, PosHold, Guided
b) always check GPS before arming in Loiter (previously could be disabled if ARMING_CHECK=0)
c) sanity check locations received from GCS for follow-me, do-set-home, do-set-ROI
d) fix optical flow failsafe (was not always triggering LAND when optical flow failed)
e) failsafe RTL vs LAND decision based on hardcoded 5m from home check (previously used WPNAV_RADIUS parameter)
Thanks for your testing!
I'm having lots of problems with mavlink telemetry both through bluetooth and minim OSD. minim OSD now almost never works. Resetting the board doesn't help. Repowering very ocasionally works. I think its more likely that these devices simply aren't receiving mav data. Is there anyway to make this more reliable? I'm also going to try going back a couple of revs because it wasn't this bad before. Could still be my hardware, but just seems odd.
Its as simple as setting correct SR settings for the correct SR port# and choosing the correct serial port. P.s. also, if you are using a **hawk its a god idea to reflash bootloader.
p.p.s. Do not forget to disable flow control for the minimosd serial port.
Yeah, I've done all that and its been working fine until the last couple of days
Just an update. Seeing lots of "accelerometers not healthy" errors. Used to get these occasionally now all the time. If I set INS_USE1=0 does that stop the pre-arm checks on the 2nd IMU?
Also what's going on here? Logs attached. clip0/clip1 have step changes. What would explain this? Are these values cumulative now?
Finally completed an autotune on roll. It resulted in very low Roll_P (0.04) and Roll_I (0.04) - very different to my manual tune above which has Roll_P (0.16) and Roll_I (0.03). Difficult to say which feels better as they both fly quite well. The autotune version seems softer. Be interested in opinions on which is better and pros/cons of both.
You actually might be right - a bunch of these settings appear to have been changed. I didn't do it so I guess it happened when the firmware got updated. Grrr.
Yes, I run autotune with parachutes on board and armed, no problem