### CORRECT PROPS for CORRECT WEIGHT and MOTORS

We have an Octo Copter with Turnigy 810 kv motors. We got composite props which we thought would be fine. It went up in the air and one broke from what we think was a stress fracture.

We have now gotten Graupner props which look much sturdier.

I am wondering why there are no specifications for  Props when it comes to the weight and size of the motors?

#### Replies

• Wow guys. I didn't think my post would cause so much typing. Thanks, I am now fully fully educated :)

• One way to test how much actual weight a prop can handle is to hang weights off it and see what the breaking point is.  Multiply that by about 8 for your Octo, since the weight is distributed over 8 props.

• @Karla: Based on what I've seen, much of the knowledge base in this area is garnered from trial-and-error.  Most of the effort (and frankly, the glamor) is in the control system and not so much in the aerodynamics.  Experience does rule, of course, but static thrust testing of model airplane propellers is a bit esoteric.  Perhaps one should either go completely with a proven solution (i.e. get a kit) or be prepared to experiment.

@Graham: No offense intended, but those calculators don't provide good results for static thrust.  They all tend to over-predict because they're using mathematical models that fall apart at low advance ratios (no forward speed).  If you want to do some comparisons, here's a database of model airplane propellers tested in a windtunnel by Dr. Selig's crew at the University of Illinois:

The props tested are just the sort most multicopter enthusiasts employ.  Unfortunately, there's a bit of math involved to get to the point of comparing the static thrust performance of one to another.

The term "figure of merit" or FM is used by helicopter aerodynamic engineers to compare the hovering efficiency of one rotor to another.  I'll spare you the long description, but it's a ratio of performance of an ideal rotor to the one in question, so it's always going to be >1.  Here's the formula (in spreadsheet notation) which you'll need to use to calculate it from the data in the "static" table:  =((CT)^1.5)/(CP)*0.707))

You'll know you've done it correctly when the FM numbers range from 0.25 to 0.55 or so.  Enjoy!

• Moderator

What brand for the composite props? I don't think the manufacturers take 'copters into account when designing props so usually it's just a RPM limitation. I've had a few props break in flight but it's always been the cheap ones.

### Activity

RT @Smartphone89: DonkeyCar Racing League Korea #donkeycar @diyrobocars https://t.co/mDlHDR1d98
17 hours ago
Jørn Ramnæs liked VIDEO LINK's profile
yesterday
Mark Harrison left a comment on Moderators
"Wow, Ning2 looks really great on mobile. I had sort of drifted away as my browse-time went more on my phone, so this is great."
yesterday
Hank Deucker left a comment on PIXHAWK
"I am sure most will say not again, Pixhawk telemetry. I do need help and all can be reassured that I have spent many hours scouring the net for useful information. I am not new at quadcopter flying, I started in 2012 and have progressed through many…"
yesterday
https://t.co/rLmFr8M2UK
yesterday
Hank Deucker left a comment on PIXHAWK
"Tomorrow, I am thinking about the wording at the moment."
Thursday
Welcome to the new DIY Drones design!. You may have noticed that DIY Drones looks a little different today. That's… https://t.co/cg2EmeDGMQ
Wednesday
New! Online Training on Drones for Disaster Response https://t.co/brqRuujjY2
Tuesday
https://t.co/8EMCvYW6oz
Tuesday
RT @OttawaAVGroup: We are going to try something new this week. We will be having a drop-in style meeting Wednesday @ 7-9pm EST. Pop in and…
Monday
RT @tawnkramer: Thanks Everyone for another fun virtual race! Amazing Ai racers competing head-to-head, Virtual Makers Fair event. Catch us…
May 23
RT @make: Find out the latest from @diyrobocars at 10am PT from @chr1sa of @3DRobotics on Virtually Make Faire! #makerfaire #maketogether #…
May 23