Ducted fan UAVs maintain a higher payload to stored volume ratio. The vehicle can carry 4x the payload of a similar footprint fixed- or open-rotor UAV. 

I have heard different things online about ducted fans vs open wing proppellers. Some say they are less efficient some say they are much more efficient!?

Ive heard of some people saying they are twice or even 4x more efficient. I'm thinking of designing a heavy lift drone and wondering if I shouls go with ducted fans..

Any input appreciated thanks!

Views: 2730

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Ducted fans are less efficient, because a smaller mass of air is used for propulsion and additional friction drag and added weight from the shroud and support structure.

The highest propulsion efficiency is a large, slow-spinning prop, not a small high revving fan.

However, large ducted propellers could overcome the disadvantages. They are very seldom used though, even with the high budgets of some major companies.

Ducted fan is less efficient, and much less efficient if you need horizontal speed too, not only hover.

http://www.avidaerospace.com/blog/2015/3/24/the-case-for-ducted-fan...

???

By reducing propeller blade tip losses, the ducted fan is more efficient in producing thrust than a conventional propeller of similar diameter, especially at low speed and high static thrust level (airships, hovercraft). ... Ducted fans offer enhanced safety on the ground.

But there are so many online sources saying that its efficient.. I actually dont care about drag or wind resistance. Just lift. And payload compacity..

If these articles are accurate I can achieve the same amount of thrust/lift with motors that are half the size? Am i wrong??

First and second article are really convincing

Rafi, I'm not sure about the 2x or 4x efficiency claims, but you could expect a 30% or 40% increase in static thrust for a well designed ducted fan compared to an open propellor of an equivalent diameter.

I'll keep meaning to work through the calculations again to compare the two, but never quite find the time.

I suspect part of the difficulty with a ducted fan quad, is that the airflow gets complex as it moves from hover into forward flight. I don't think there is a lot of thought put into the aerodynamic design of a lot of quads and shrouding the rotors with the aim of increasing efficiency would require that extra effort.

Have a look at the following two papers for some fact-based discussion:

Rutkowski & Krusz "Design and Analysis of Ducted Fan for Mult-R...

Abrego 'Performance Study of a Ducted Fan System'

Sam

Worthington Sharpe

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Groups

Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest 
A list of all T3 contests is here. The current round, the Vertical Horizontal one, is here

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service