Heavy Lift (20-60Kg) Frames ... who has one?

Over the last three years I have been monitoring the web for evidence of large, heavy lift, commercially capable systems, for loads in excess of 10Kg


As many of you may know, there are a lack of larger frames on the market, that can handle more than 10Kg.


Rimcopters can manage 40Kg loads, and more!!!


From my research, I have found that many "heavy lift" frames are lacking one thing or the other. Either they are too heavy, or they are not strong enough. In both cases the frames are made using "tube and plate" style assemblies.


Three years ago I began developing a new type of multirotor frame. The basic idea came from my experiments with Aluminum extruded tubing as a core frame...bike rims.


This may sound quaint, perhaps even a bit tacky...bike rims for Commercial sUAS and UAV's...


I admit, its easy to get the wrong idea... I am not out in the dump collecting old bike parts to make recycled cheap frames! Stick with me for a bit, and discover why I kept going with this idea, and where I ended up :)


First, let me say that I am not here to bash anyone... There are millions of dollars invested into various manufactured designs, and those dollars are worth protecting!


It is not my desire to obliterate others hard work! My goal here is simple  : make the best multirotor possible ! The fact that what I have made is less expensive, and easy to buy and build... That it is made entirely of stock components... And can be reproduced in any part of the world may be concerning to some... I am only here to show that what I have made has value, is useful, and may help some of you in your goals.


Please, if you are offended, or don't have anything useful to add... Please refrain from offering any comments!


If you are an operator, and individual or company that see's value in the work, please contribute !!!


I do not sell frames, or systems... I learned that lesson!


I do not have a business, nor do I intend to create one... So relax!  Just enjoy the ride, and take from it what you can... If you intend to take this idea, and make a business... Beware ! I will not tolerate it, and ultimately, it would be better to just ask me to use the design, and pay for that use.


Individuals, who would like to reproduce my results may do so, for their own use... Make one, use it, and prosper!  However, if you intend to make them for commercial use... Please remember that this is my intellectual property... And I can and will protect it :)



Now, onto the good stuff



Rimcopter is a TYPE of multi rotor frame, not a brand. To be honest, I didn't even coin the phrase. The name simply denotes what it is... A multirotor made from bike rims.


WHY BIKE RIMS?


Thanks to 100+ yrs of production and development, the bike rim is lighter, stronger.. Less expensive than custom designed parts to do a similar job.


Tube and plate designs could never create the same strength to weight ratio's apparent in my designs, nor can the tube and plates adequately deal with Vibration and Deflection issues... The truth is, Tube and Plates could never be expected to hold the weight, and as a result of the design, they suffer from vibrations effects... Jello, lack of resolution, and over loaded flight controllers, trying desperately to over come the errors created due to motor deflections and stray vibrations!


Rimcopters are completely different. The flight controller and loads are completely isolated from the drive system. In addition, the strength to weight offered in the frame reduces the load to the motors substantially. The result is longer flights, with greater flight ability and performance... Without any complications from stray high frequency oscillations or motors moving all over the place...


When I say lighter, I mean MUCH lighter... In any given example, our frame design will be lighter. Sure, you can make a light tube and plate, however, it would never been strong enough to handle the loads!


AS an example, the 1000mm X8 Aluminum design, AUW of 1.2Kg including 30mm CF Landing gear (can take 200Lbs !!)


Y6 Carbon  900mm... 780g


In both cases the frames can take well over 150Lbs force, before ANY movement / deflection.


AS comparison, I can deflect the motors of a s900 with just two fingers... Less than 10Lbs force.


Too good to be true?


Not at all... The strength of this design is that ANYONE can produce one for them selves, and because of that, it is unlikely that any larger corporation will attempt to produce it.


So, you can see, its not marginally lighter... less than 1/2 the weight in many cases!

not slightly stronger... Exponentially stronger!


Not slightly less expensive... Frames can be made for as little as $75 - $150.


So then, what are you waiting for ?


Need a larger, stronger, less expensive frame ?


Of course you do!!!

What I can offer...Two formats ( X* and Y6 ) , in two sizes, from three materials ( carbon, aluminum or steel)

Welded, bonded, or bolted...

DSC02656.JPG

DSC02488.JPG

DSC02859.JPG

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Developer

    There is no perfect design. It's all a balance act between weight, strength, cost and being easy to build/repair.

    The "plate and tube" design is very common because it utilize mass produced CF parts to lower cost and make manufacturing easier. And you will be hard pressed to find other workable materials with the strength to weight ratio of CF.

    Also keep in mind that the traditional center plate design, is only one of many possible "tube and plate" solutions. Once you start to size up, it makes more sense to open up the center area to make room for equipment.

    3702385704?profile=original

    And from my experience I have found that payload capacity is not limited by frame strength, but mostly propeller size and overall propulsion system lift capacity.

    So the real questions before you even start looking for a new design then becomes.

    - Is the "tube and plate" design strong enough for you application (heavy lifter)?

    - Can you make an alternative design that is cheaper to manufacture, and still has equal or better strength to weight ratio?

  • Hello I like your round copter design! But your current copter design has a flaw use of round tubes
    Cause tork on motor mount cussing them to twist out of place causing a crash. Better to use rectangle tubes. Or heavy lift copter incorporate this , as well as motor mounts for U8-U11 heavy duty motor and 620 long arms in X8 config to handle 30 inch prop frame comes with BGC gimbal.
    http://brushlessgimbal.ca/Cinestar-Parts/X8-Quad-Multirotor-Frame-H...;
    X8 Quad Multirotor Frame Heavy Lift with rectangular booms [UAV8-X8] - $1,400.99 : www.brushlessgim…
    www.brushlessgimbal.ca X8 Quad Multirotor Frame Heavy Lift with rectangular booms [UAV8-X8] - X8 Quad Multirotor Frame Drone Kit for Heavy Lift with…

  • Aevi would love to get your list for a 60kg frame build.
    Aevi Goth said:

    the torsional effect is the issue... vertical flex, if not associated with torsional deflection is fine.

    In this design, due to the way the rims are designed to clamp on the tube ( clincher) there is little flex or deflection whatsoever at all... this is mostly due to the short booms lenght.

    Tube and plates would need to make massive plates to cover the area ( think Ricopter) and that results in a a HEAVY frame, that still loads the FC with stray vibrations.

    The original rimcopter was a single rim... its a design shared by a few, including another member of this group.

    have a look at my original thread, from RCgroups:

    http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2109318

    What I did with that design was make it more usefull... modular, scaleable... and so on.

  • I agree on the landing gear... in this case the gear is not gear at all... simply a stand , whereas the load casing is the proper landing gear.

    I have many option for landing gear, some which act as a roll cage and can withstand multiple angle impacts for many hundred kg of force.

    modular scale-ability ;)

    The Xfold many "look the part" however... The tube and plate construction are heavy, and flimsy compared to the Rimcopter.

    Also, i will add that this frame suffers from mid band torsional effects, and suffers from a complex series of vibrational and deflectional disorders.... Rimcopters vibration free, 100% mechanically separated "hollow core" provides the platform for ultimate strength to weight, highest vibrational acuity... that's what I assert, and am prepared to demonstrate.

    In addition, the Rimcopter is composed of higher quality, industrially certified components , like EASTON alloy and top quality , ISO certified stock components.

    Rimcopters can be build as certified units, insurable units in any country of the world... identical units for the lowest possible cost... open source support... integrated, modular kits for OEM distribution's.

    2017 will be the year Rimcopters will begin to deliver Certified, insurable fleets for international distribution, integrated leasing with full service and support for enterprise.

  • Thank you for your reply Oliver!

    Olivier said:

    Hi Byron,

    All in all, yes. With two caveats: landing gear definitely feels flimsy, it works but I think Foxtech new "double" landing gear is a better choice. In fact and unless there is a real need, I'd go with a  fixed gear if I was building again. Other caveat is the folding "umbrella" style mechanism. It's ok and definitely makes it transportable, but I'd prefer lateral/horizontal folding, which would make it much easier to make a box for it.

    Overall  if I had to choose a frame all over again I'd probably give some serious consideration to a frame like Brian Goff's. Or this one, although much more expensive (some might say over priced). Depends on budget as usual, what else is new ;)

    Btw I came upon a similar heavy lift build with a Gryphon frame recently, that proved to be quite inadequate. I think those may be good up to say 10kg AUW if that. Way too much play in removable arm mechanism, and too much flex overall.

  • Hi Byron,

    All in all, yes. With two caveats: landing gear definitely feels flimsy, it works but I think Foxtech new "double" landing gear is a better choice. In fact and unless there is a real need, I'd go with a  fixed gear if I was building again. Other caveat is the folding "umbrella" style mechanism. It's ok and definitely makes it transportable, but I'd prefer lateral/horizontal folding, which would make it much easier to make a box for it.

    Overall  if I had to choose a frame all over again I'd probably give some serious consideration to a frame like Brian Goff's. Or this one, although much more expensive (some might say over priced). Depends on budget as usual, what else is new ;)

    Btw I came upon a similar heavy lift build with a Gryphon frame recently, that proved to be quite inadequate. I think those may be good up to say 10kg AUW if that. Way too much play in removable arm mechanism, and too much flex overall.

  • Are you happy with the D130, Oliver?

    Olivier said:

    Heck of an idea, and your designs are gorgeous.

    The commercially available heavy lifters I know of are the Foxtech D130, Gryphon Dynamics 1400mm frame, and  MikroKopter's "big quatro" and Octo XL.  Here's a video of the Gryphon frame at 28kg Auw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onWyHq0nhqA

    Don't know much about the Mikrokopters and Gryphon,  but I fly the D130. It's borderline at 18Kg+, ok around 15kg. Would not really work at 20kg+, although a new re-inforced version is probably ok at 25kg ...The weak points are (retractable) landing gear, and center plate stiffness. The arms are 30mm 1mm thick, center plates are 3mm thick. But this variant would probably work up to 25kg or more ...:

    One thing is that for anything above 15kg AUW, an X8  1000mm frame is not going to cut it as you need propellers larger than 24" (for any flight time longer than 5 minutes). Tiger motor U8-U11 will take 28"-30" propellers and I think your design would be great with a 1300-1500 X8 frame.

    The only downside I can think of with your designs so far  is lack of foldability (important at these sizes) and no retractable landing gear. No retractable landing gear is not a show stopper most of the time. And  a few bolts to remove the rims if the arms were pivoting would be ok.

    I really like your idea of "rim" reinforcement. I can see how you could get away with lighter and weaker (straight) arms yet get a stiffer and lighter frame overall.

    Any idea about the sort of frame weight you could achieve with a 1,400 mm quad design, say suitable for 30kg Auw?

    Great work, cheers!

  • How long have you been working with Euan?

  • Brian - Where are you at with theses heavy lifting copters? They look very promising. I want to know more.

  • MR60

    We use VulcanFrames in our builds. They sustain dozens of pounds.

    Extract from their web site:

    Here is an unedited photgraph taken at the end of a product shoot – the brick test!

    3702107098?profile=original

    In this picture the Hexa is supported on three arms only, at full 1200mm span… and sitting on top of the centre plates are 28kg of house bricks. It could have taken more had there been more bricks available.

    https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3702107098?profile=original
This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @SmallpixelCar @diyrobocars It's just something that's easy to track with chroma keying. I ended up using different colors on th…
17 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
17 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @TinkerGen_: "The Tinkergen MARK ($199) is my new favorite starter robocar. It’s got everything — computer vision, deep learning, sensor…
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Join our FREE Sumo Competition 🤖🏆 👉 https://roboton.io/ranking/vsc2020 #sumo #robot #edtech #competition #games4ed https://t.co/WOx…
Nov 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of Tinkergen MARK robocar https://ift.tt/36IeZHc
Nov 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Our review of the @TinkerGen_ MARK robocar, which is the best on the market right now https://diyrobocars.com/2020/11/15/first-impressions-of-tinkergen-mark-robocar/ https://t.co/ENIlU5SfZ2
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Ingmar_Stapel: I have now explained the OpenBot project in great detail on my blog with 12 articles step by step. I hope you enjoy read…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: This is a must attend. Click the link, follow link to read the story, sign up. #chaos2020 #digitalconnection #digitalworld ht…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Got a new chassis for outdoor races (hobbyking Quantum Vandal) but I totally didn't expect that it might cause problems for my g…
Nov 11
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of the Intel OpenBot https://ift.tt/36qkVV4
Nov 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Excellent use of cardboard instead of 3D printing! https://twitter.com/Ingmar_Stapel/status/1324960595318333441
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: We've got a record 50 teams competing in this month's @DIYRobocars @donkey_car virtual AI car race. Starting today at 10:00am…
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Car's view, using a fisheye camera. The ceiling light tracking algorithm gave me some ideas to improve ConeSLAM, and having grou…
Nov 5
More…