I am planning to build a Quadcopter for some time, I have all the required gear and an airframe completed. Before I start assembling the entire quad I would like to know what the lifting capability will be when complete.

 

I know that one motor with a 2 blade prop will lift 2Kg whithout any hassle at approximately 70% power (thrust test, not in airframe). Does this mean that for a quadcopter I can assume that four motors will lift 8Kg @ 2Kg per motor or is there some other calculation to accomplish this?

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  •  Can someone help me with this for amp draw http://diydrones.com/forum/topics/trouble-with-a-hex-voltage?xg_sou...

  • I have a standard 3dr quad, with gimbal, telemetry,850kv motors , 3,300 mah lipo, 20amps esc, 1047 props
    Total wight is 2100grs, I am very disappointed with flight time and also lifting capability , it hovers at very hight throttle, and is difficult to control when it goes down even at low vertical speed .

    The way it is now is almost useless, then I know I have to decrease weight to solve all the other problems, but what is the fun of taking all the equipment out, then the questions is , what is the logical way to go , ? , bigger props , 4s instead of 3s , larger motors , ?
    Or just quad was a mistake and should go to exa.?

    Thanks,
  • Developer

    You should calculate lift at ~50% throttle. In other words the copter and payload should hover at 50% throttle. The reason for this is that the copter needs a lot of thrust headroom to maneuver properly. You also get very short flight times if you push the system to much.

  • Roman Hofstetter is on the money with www.ecalc.ch - it's probably more accurate, because it lets you configure theoretical payloads. You'll get more accurate results if your motors and props appear in the list, and that your battery specs (particularly weight-per-cell) are reflected correctly.

     

    Note: some frames have a "thrust per arm" limit. eg: www.quadframe.com.

  • hmmmmm...

    i am using 330 size Brushless Outrunner, 1400kv motor and

    Thunder Power 2700mAh 2S 7.4v 25C battery.... can any1 say wat vl be the thrust and lift

  • wow that link calculator is good man!

     

    Tks for that Roman

  • I know it's an old topic, but for all those finding it with google or anyhow, here another link:

    www.ecalc.ch

  • You use THIS to find out how much thrust you should have mathematically.

    Then you need to make sure those motors going flat out are within your ESC capabilities.

    Then you need to make sure that your batteries can be discharged as fast as 4 of those motors flat out.

    If you get a no from any of these you cannot do it.

     

    Combining the thrust from all four motors is not like 4x thrust of one. The turbulence created by each motors wake will interact and sap some of this thrust. Dependent on far to many factors to establish an accurate answer (as quite a few are environmental) you should make a safety combined thrust 80% of 4x motors. Also you should realise that thrust decrease with altitude (less air to push means less thrust).

    Propeller Thrust Calculator
  • Assuming your power grid will be able to feed them all at once (what is that, 40 A each?), then yes, you multiply by 4 :-)
  • Mhh.. seems to be a big motor. :)
    I think you have to carry a lot of accu power to drive such motors some minutes.
This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @TinkerGen_: "The Tinkergen MARK ($199) is my new favorite starter robocar. It’s got everything — computer vision, deep learning, sensor…
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Join our FREE Sumo Competition 🤖🏆 👉 https://roboton.io/ranking/vsc2020 #sumo #robot #edtech #competition #games4ed https://t.co/WOx…
Nov 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of Tinkergen MARK robocar https://ift.tt/36IeZHc
Nov 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Our review of the @TinkerGen_ MARK robocar, which is the best on the market right now https://diyrobocars.com/2020/11/15/first-impressions-of-tinkergen-mark-robocar/ https://t.co/ENIlU5SfZ2
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Ingmar_Stapel: I have now explained the OpenBot project in great detail on my blog with 12 articles step by step. I hope you enjoy read…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: This is a must attend. Click the link, follow link to read the story, sign up. #chaos2020 #digitalconnection #digitalworld ht…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Got a new chassis for outdoor races (hobbyking Quantum Vandal) but I totally didn't expect that it might cause problems for my g…
Nov 11
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of the Intel OpenBot https://ift.tt/36qkVV4
Nov 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Excellent use of cardboard instead of 3D printing! https://twitter.com/Ingmar_Stapel/status/1324960595318333441
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: We've got a record 50 teams competing in this month's @DIYRobocars @donkey_car virtual AI car race. Starting today at 10:00am…
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Car's view, using a fisheye camera. The ceiling light tracking algorithm gave me some ideas to improve ConeSLAM, and having grou…
Nov 5
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: To get ground truth I measured the rug, found the pixel coordinates of its corners, calibrated my phone camera with my standard…
Nov 5
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @DIYRobocars is back in December, but outside. Time to reinvestigate ConeSLAM! I rigged up a quick and dirty ground-truth captur…
Nov 5
More…