Has anyone used a long range wifi connection to fly FPV, showing live video and telemetry feed? heres a lan card I was thinking about

and here is a servo command board http://endurance-rc.com/

they say with a high gain antenna you could get 50km los what you think? I dont know any visual basics and I have not made a fpv system before do you think this is feasible for a noob?  thanks

Views: 8689

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

wifibroadcast is what you sound like you need.

Looks interesting but I dont understand the reason why you want 50km connection?as I know, Drones has cca 20mins of flying duration for one battery charge, so what is the point?

i've got some 26db 2.4ghz rocket-dish antennas, how would those do with an n rocket? I am worried about the heavily non-symetric link?

i've got a nice harmonic drive setup I could toss together as a gimbal with some ac servos.

i've got some 26db 2.4ghz rocket-dish antennas, how would those do with an n rocket? I am worried about the heavily non-symetric link?

i've got a nice harmonic drive setup I could toss together as a gimbal with some ac servos.

Wifi datalink no problem, WiFi digital video stream (h.264 and friends) lots of problems.

The problem with digital video over WiFi can be boiled down to not having graceful degradation.

On analog you have graceful degradation as an inherent part of the composite video signal. As long as you still have a sync signal, the video image just gradually gets more noisy until at last it is completely lost. It also instantly shows an image the moment reception becomes good enough again.

On the other hand digitally compressed video streams have very little margin for error in the signal, and does not handle loss of bandwidth as the WiFi reception degrades. And when the margin is exceeded the video stream will most often break apart completely. And once the stream has broken down, it will need large chunks of valid data and up to several seconds to restore and decode video again.

What antenna are you proposing? It doesn't seem likely that you'd ever get anything close to 50 km. 

That's what wifibroadcast does, it brings graceful degradation to digital video.  Still needs work though, particularly on latency.

John Arne Birkeland said:

Wifi datalink no problem, WiFi digital video stream (h.264 and friends) lots of problems.

The problem with digital video over WiFi can be boiled down to not having graceful degradation.

On analog you have graceful degradation as an inherent part of the composite video signal. As long as you still have a sync signal, the video image just gradually gets more noisy until at last it is completely lost. It also instantly shows an image the moment reception becomes good enough again.

On the other hand digitally compressed video streams have very little margin for error in the signal, and does not handle loss of bandwidth as the WiFi reception degrades. And when the margin is exceeded the video stream will most often break apart completely. And once the stream has broken down, it will need large chunks of valid data and up to several seconds to restore and decode video again.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service