I've been jumping through some hoops to get things powered on my multi-rotor rigs lately and it occurred to me that a slightly more advanced version of the 3DR Power Module could solve it really neatly.

My suggestions for 2.0 is in addition to the power going to the APM and the pass-through power for the motors, have additional 5V and 12V breakouts. It would also be good if it could handle more than 4S, for larger Octocopter rigs:

Input: 12-25v (3S-6S)

Outputs:

1) bypass (same as input)

2) 5v for APM

3) 5v for other (camera gimbal servos, video tx, etc)

4) 12v (some common FPV gear, etc)

And I think the APM's power connector should use a more secure connection to the Power Module, I've had it come loose (thankfully not in flight) because that cable gets yanked around a bit connecting and disconnecting packs. Perhaps a Molex style connector with a little latch.

All in favor say 'aye!'

Views: 2301

Replies to This Discussion

7v would be sweet to, many tx equipements use 7v

+1 :)

Damn, I've just noticed the 4S maximum, and I've just wired mine in! I am using 6S - will I fry it?
Yes. 18v max for the PM.
Aye. The Power Module scales voltage 10:1, having a regulator that can handle 50V would be great for a 2.0PM The current sensor is designed to take 90A. I would say that having the regulator on board makes more sense than a wire connection.

Personally I was going to mod mine to be soldered using the pads on the back, and use servo connectors. Servo connectors seen more robust than the DF13 style cable for power applications. Though all connectors are potential problems.

I have been working awhile with similar idea so let's start to look this more. I was also looking to have one power unit that will have 2 inputs for redundant 5V supply. 

maybe this , instead of PTH08080 on 3DR Power Module

4.5V to 28V Input, Dual 3A Outputs

that is ok looking device too but i would say that it would be better to have 2 separate psu units especially if we plan to run digital servos from one of them. Digi servos tend to eat a lot of energy and you don't want that APM power is starting to fluctuate 

I will look if we can make test boards for this TI chip to see how it works in generally. My original idea was to have one integrated psu on main board and then having space for another that can be either 5/6/7 volt unit and all these would go trough main current measurement.

I use an adjustable stepdown buck converter

DC-DC 4-40V(in) to 1.25-37V(out) Voltage Converter Step-Down Buck Module

they are available on ebay for $4 - $15 free shipping (without wires shown in pic)

Heres oneThat goes lower on the input

As an added suggestion for the future, how about building the Power Module into the Power Distribution Board. I think that would be super slick, one less added on component.  Has anyone considered that?  I cut the connector off my PM and soldered it directly to the PDB to at least get rid of the extra connection.

I all for a better PM. Would be nice to be able to power both APM and other equipment. The ability to feed higher voltage would be nice.
I vote aye!

I would agree with 2 separate PSUs. Have the APM with an on-board regulator 2.5A is good enough (no servos), that can handle 3s-10s supply voltage. Have a breakout board for VI Sense and it carries the power from the VI sense board to the APM (Higher voltage lower current, better for wire being thinner). Reconfigure the APM to have CH1-CH11 (PWM Outputs) on a separate bus that can be powered with 5V-7V UBEC (or whatever regulator) that you need for your application. 

RSS

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service