Pixhawk 2 User Group

Provide a place to discuss the development of firmware and accessory hardware for the Pixhawk 2 stand alone navigation controller.

Members: 274
Latest Activity: Jan 27

Discussion Forum

Mission Planner/PixHawk 2.1 log dates are for 1999

Started by Jon Turner. Last reply by Jon Turner Jan 27. 4 Replies

I am still learning the software, but all my logs after the new year show to be 1999. How do I change the time/date settings?Continue

Here GPS weight - case or not

Started by Boas61. Last reply by SkyRover Jan 24. 2 Replies

Hi allI am putting together a Mini Talon UAV with the Pixhawk 2.1 flight controller and the Here GPS. My build ends up being a bit heavy, so I am trying to remove weight where possible.In this regard…Continue

What is the difference between Pixhawk 2 and Pixhawk 2.1?

Started by Ken McNamara. Last reply by Ken McNamara Jan 3. 2 Replies

Is there a document that defines the difference between Pixhawk 2 and Pixhawk 2.1?I'm referring to mechanical and component differences?Maybe more to the point is what problems drove the update to…Continue

How to wire parallel power supplies

Started by Andrew Challenger. Last reply by Andrew Challenger Dec 7, 2017. 2 Replies

I'm in the final stages of building an octocopter around Pixhawk 2.1 and am just trying to sort out how to wire power.The craft is a Tarot X8 running the standard 40a esc/4114 320 motor/1555 props…Continue

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Pixhawk 2 User Group to add comments!

Comment by Aaron on May 17, 2016 at 12:30pm

Building a fixed wing long range mapper. Curious what the Pixhawk 2 will bring? Support for multiple camera systems, basic on-board processing, running dual GNSS? Any confirmed dates for release?


Comment by Senyao Lian on May 16, 2016 at 11:44pm

I download a set of code iCGS on github ,but it can't run in Xcode.who have the code about UAV ,please contact me ,thank you!!!

Comment by Jani Hirvinen on April 4, 2016 at 4:50pm

NOTE!  WE HAVE MOVED! ==============================================

We now have a new shiny discussion and support forum for ArduPilot, Pixhawk, Linux and supporting projects at

Please come visit us there for all things ArduPilot. We look forward to seeing you.

Full announcement @ here

Comment by DG on March 26, 2016 at 9:11am

Any new information?

Comment by Philip on March 10, 2016 at 8:33pm
Hi Richard
Key advantages are, built in vibration isolation, heated IMU, modular, redundant power and additional sensors.
Comment by Richard Kennedy on March 10, 2016 at 4:11pm

Thomas [ or anyone ] what is expected to be advantageous for the pix 2 compared to the pix 1? thx

Comment by Phil Horner on February 26, 2016 at 6:48pm

By New Zealand standards, that's Spidezilla!

Comment by Philip on February 26, 2016 at 6:39pm
By Australian standards, that's not a big spider....

Comment by Thomas J Coyle III on February 26, 2016 at 1:50pm

@Fnoop Dogg,

That is just the FCU removed from its carrier board. It is a very compact flight controller by itself, but is about the same size as a PH1 when attached to its carrier board.



Comment by Fnoop on February 26, 2016 at 1:36pm

Is that a tiny tiny tiny pixhawk2..



© 2018   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service