Gary Mortimer's Posts (323)

Sort by
Moderator

Aberporth 2009

If you were thinking about going to see the flying, don't bother.http://www.shephard.co.uk/files/events/flying_demo_postponement_press_release.pdfIt had already made news in West Waleshttp://www.tivysideadvertiser.co.uk/news/4422596.UAV____snub____for_Ceredigion/The Sheppard group are winning hearts and minds there right now!!Maybe the home built community in the UK could go an support the local bars there.I vote that the fly off happens from a beach nearby rather ;-)
Read more…
Moderator

Flipping weather

Got up early this morning to catch a break in the weather before rain.Two hours more time on airframe 1 Airframe 2, now comes in three fits,Observer - looking at things one.Telegraph - relaying things one.Guardian - looking for baddies or fence breaks one.Its all coming together very well, after I've charged everything again I shall head out for another two hours of flying. This time with some sandwiches.

Read more…
Moderator

One GCS fits all

Grown ups are doing ithttp://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/One-for-All-AAI-Textrons-UAV-Control-System-05412/Maybe there should be a Flying Fox, Ardu, Atto common GCS?? (insert device I have forgotten)Something that allows a group of three people with three different systems on board their airframes to get together and share data.Thinking along way ahead....Pain in the backside if you all turn up at a SAR incident and have to jump seats between GCS to keep three types over the scene continuously.If you see what I mean.I dont have the skills but an open GCS would seem the way to go?
Read more…
Moderator

Airframe 3

Well finally its nearly ready to fly Just waiting for the wind to drop for a test flight.Its a modular thing, with stacks of room for gear in the front a work in progress of course. Hopefully of course it will provide a steady platform for an Attopilot which should be released from its shackles before too long. Dean has another one of the smaller ones which he should be test flying, thats Airframe 2. Airframe 1 is being flown to bits in order to see how well the EPP performs after lots of UV on it. Hopefully in the end we will have a useful platform at FlyingScotsCam for doing the work of the Twinstar and flying wing.
Read more…
Moderator

Airframe testing

Before commiting expensive gear to an anything and in the interests of I wonder.I have been flying this airframe quite hard.Yesterday I load tested it using five of these at 58g each the multipack 5 came to 290gWithout load I have achived flights in the order of one hour obviously that will change.The aircraft has a 40 inch wingspan and easily fits on the back seat of my car. A simple solution for when we go out and get this sort of shotWorking towards an Attopilot being fitted for vertical stitch shots of archaeological stuff.On the drawing board a more efficient wing and larger, probably just shy of 2m easily able to lift 500g for one hour.A platform nose for FPV/Stills cameras and plenty of internal space for vertical/horizontally mounted cameras and gear.Flat wing this time with outboard ailerons. The airframe being roughly double this ones size. Also thinking of having a small or large wing for different tasks or wind speeds.Hopefully some pictures of a rough setup within the month.This bigger airframe will be used for some animal research tasks in Kenya, Tanzania and South Africa. Mostly lifting repeaters for animal tracking collars.For test Airframe 1, I have set up a TwitPerhaps the first UAV airframe with its own Twitter feed??I am hoping to fly 100 hours in the next month or two, so far I am ahead of schedule but weather is coming next week so I'm sure that will get in the way.
Read more…
Moderator

Wing upgrade for Superstar (SPAD wing)

Quite by chance I had a Superstar.When DIYdrones first flighted I was amused to see one being used and I think I have seen in somewhere in the East a military one.

That one having an off and landing on a house which made the local papersAnyhow, after many many fun hours teaching three or four people to fly with the Superstar, whilstI was overseas my young aviator decided to use the Superstar as a chuck glider from the top of their climbing frame.This went well for several flights so I am told, the garden being on a slight slope allowed the Superstar to fly all the way to the bottom.It was not perhaps designed for such things.I was slightly miffed bcause I had recently stripped the covering as it was tatty and the aircraft was now a spirited red.Well the wings were, the fuse had only been started.To cut a long story short, more out of boredom but also out of a desire to prove Dean wrong.For it is he that said he had failed to find an aircraft that the Attopilot could not fly.I determined to make a set of wings, with my boys,from some roofing foam that we had. The fuselage we simply nicked some correx signboards and glued them onto the gaps.Later having flown it, I thought that if I got to 5 hours flying time I would put the dimensions out there so that somebody could do a better job!All we did was tape some dowels in it for strength, cutting it first to what looked the right size in proportion to the airframe. Its a polyhedral 5% crank at the centre 15 at the tips. Again that just looked right.The aerofoil was a soldering iron cut steeper at the front shallower at the back.Then everything was taped together with reinforced tape.Just yesterday I measured it for the first time, the tips are 30 cm and main 90 cm each side making a total of 2.4m Cord 30cm. Quite a neat number for something that was just done by eye!To make things look right on the airframe, the weight and drag of wheels was forgotten.Looked like the thing was going to be short coupled so I increased the length of the rudder and elevator to bring things back a bit.For the first flight it was plain that we needed to strengthen the middle a little as the wings virtually tried to clap. But it flew.On the third flight I added my co pilot, because I also wanted to explore rudder elevator only with the co pilot. I forgot to mention no ailerons in this bird.In the three aircraft I have tried with rudder elevator and co pilot I have found that as long as the gain is reduced the co pilot handles it pretty well. This particular wing has quite a dihedral and the aircraft is inherantly stable.Test flying commenced on the 31st of January and 16 days later after 33 flights 5 hours have been achived, it would have been quicker, but the weather has not played ball.Now done properly, perhaps a built up wing or even a better foam one, properly cut, I am certain the performance will improve.A wing upgrade for your Ardupilot equiped Superstar will increase useful load, and time in the air.I'm using a Dualsky 50 equivalent motor, RAM 12 x 6 prop, 40 amp esc and 3S 2100 lipo.I'm sure somebody here will come up with a neater solution, but I know these measurements work for me so they should for you!With a better matched power set up with electric prop lighter wing and no bodged tail I'm sure an hour would be possible.

Read more…
Moderator

Observer Airframe, now heres a challenge

Op_Flight_1.jpg

From an email that Rob just sent... Now I'm sure we all have ideas for what we would like in an airframe.

If you put it here I'll make sure he reads this thread.

The desert hawk is epp, and so are others being developed. We are producing airframes

for a major UK military contractor, its gone UAV crazy over here with a massive dedicated centre being built here in Bristol.

It would be good fun to create a package for amateur developers .

If you have a spec you would like, then let me know.

Regards Rob

Read more…
Moderator

Another airframe

Whilst flicking through the pages of a magazine, I came across....vtrainer_web.jpg

The only down side for South Africa and in particular up here in the mountains is the size, probably can't lift a camera as well with a high density altitude.

I send an email off to Flying Wings asking for a bigger one and Robert Swynnerton very quickly replied that they were building one for our very purpose that would be available soon.

Called the Observer and I quote....

The Observer will be modular so you can have a conventional tail anddifferent payload configs, as you wish. It will look similar to the DessertHawk 1, seeRobert Swynnerton
Read more…
Moderator

UAV causes media stir.

Go here first. http://www.click2houston.com/investigates/14659066/detail.html

Is more being made of this than is necessary?? I wonder why the reporters spin did not point towards the environmental benefit of UAV's less gas than the helicopter. The newscopter that was chasing, is that not invading the privacy of some police officers on a private farm??

Newscopters falling from the sky constitute quite a danger to the public, as last years crash in Phoneix Arizona proved.

So is raising the privacy issue, the pot calling the kettle black. Whats newsroom rights for one, is police invasion for others.

But I certainly agree that since 911 many basic human rights and freedoms are being lost worldwide under the banner of anti terrorism. Many of them just plain dumb. If you have flown internationally recently you will know the pain that is the new liquids rule.

All liquids that can be picked up once your through the security gate in duty free. Perhaps the sale of clear plastic bags world wide has gone down, so something needed to be done to lift them.

What really worries me here is that UAV's are being shown in a sinister light. The ability of UAV's to do dangerous, dirty difficult jobs at a lower cost with less risk to life should be emphasized at every turn.

Otherwise everytime you take your Lego autopilot out to play in your black van wearing shades you might come under TV Helicopter scrutiny. Perhaps Lego should be banned, thats the answer. It clearly demonstrates an invasion of your neighbours privacy.

I don't care if I'm lost in the hills or out to sea and a UAV, blackhawk helicopter or Buck Rodgers in his space ship hove over the horizon to find me, just as long as I am found.

Its no secret that the UK CAA may impose restricts on aircraft less than 7KG in weight with UAV equipment onboard.

Heres an extract from a 2004 policy document.

This policy is applicable to all types of UAV

Systems, including those of novel design.

UAVs under 7kg mass fall within the Small

Aircraft definition of the Air Navigation

Order (ANO) [6] and are exempt from most

regulatory provisions. Such UAV Systems

are currently the subject of a further review.

by the UK-CAA and may be included within

this policy at a later date.

Civil Aviation Authorities are pulling standards together and the days of the amateur developer are probably numbered.

Newscopter pilots need not worry for their jobs as aviation grown ups have already spotted that the media would like UAV's and will probably close the loop before its even slightly opened.

Ho humm, suppose I must start my working day.

G

Read more…
Moderator

Interesting looking airframe

Whilst perusing RC groups I came across this challenger review, looks just the job for aerial photos, combining size (lifting ability) and a rear mounted engine. I'm sure it would'nt take too much effort to make this a tail dragger. No prop in forward facing shots.

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=722800

Whilst your there its worth having a look at the UAV forum as well, fantastic amount of information.

http://www.rcgroups.com/uav-unmanned-aerial-vehicles-238/


I suspect most people here are already members.

This weekend I acquired a new airframe, a Cessna 182 which I will have a crack at getting together tommorrow, its built just minus radio. I also managed to hard land and break in two a chums big stick which I am busy repairing for him. Whoops, sorry Johan. At a club to boot so many witnesses, Johan was then to suffer more bad luck when a chap had a midair with his second aircraft.

I spent today in Nambiti Game Reserve which helped remind me of why I started this UAV mission, I don't seem to have progressed very far but perhaps am more aware of all the problems I might encounter now. (Well beginning to be more aware) One thing is for sure, thermal imaging is going to have to be the way forward in dense bush.

But for now to bed.

Gary Mortimer




Read more…
Moderator

And on looking at the E6B

It would seem that being +30 at 4000' means something, which of course I already knew, but just what is the drop in performance on a 50 odd inch wing trainer??

What magic program or website could tell me that to lift lets say an extra 1KG of equipment at a density altitude of 7000' the aircraft would need to be X wingspan with Y power up front??

There must be something out there that will tell us such things.

As I walked into add this little bit, my wife said come and look at this, making its way across our dining room was a tiny mole snake, or thats what we think it was anyway.

I must be back in Africa!!!

Sorry if my blog posts are annoying some as they appear on the front page, very little hard core UAV and lots of off topic, but it should encourage some of the 270 other members to move me off the page ;-)

Gary Mortimer, now that the storm has passed.....

Read more…