I am sorry if this has been posted before. Truly inspiring.


Views: 175

Comment by Jack Crossfire on April 20, 2011 at 2:32pm
The only difference between guys who get paid to do it & hobbyists is these guys dress up & sit in a conference room & have German accents.  Disappointing that the V tail wasn't enough.
Comment by Andrew Van Der Plaats on April 21, 2011 at 4:10am
Thanks for sharing.  It's an impressive example of what mankind can do when he sets his mind to a task.
Comment by S.G. Sutter on April 21, 2011 at 7:50am
Yes, thanks for sharing this!  Fascinating to see what went on in the creation of this machine.
Comment by Paul Mather on April 21, 2011 at 11:36am

That is a really neat video.


CG looks to be a little too far back....

Comment by Ethan Ferrell on April 21, 2011 at 1:40pm
....but its 3D CG!

Comment by John Arne Birkeland on April 21, 2011 at 3:36pm
The person with the radio controller is definitively a R/C pilot in his spare time. Who else would have a tube of UHU poor and a sheet of depron at hand to quickly improvise a tail surface. :)
Comment by MarcS on April 22, 2011 at 2:25pm


The person with the radio is an R/C pilot full time :-)   (He is not a FESTO employee)
He was the inventor of indoor flight nearly 15 years back, in the time before brushless and lipo... And has made a business out of that...

And by the way, when they say they are experts in aerodynamics and stuff, why are they surprised that an airplane without a vertical stabilizer does not fly straight?

Comment by Gerry Lichter on April 23, 2011 at 12:24am

Good video. On the first takeoff at 11:38 I gasped over the realism.


Even the best video flights seemed like it was a little over weight. Li-Poly and CF still isn't good enough to beat nature? Just barely though... I've heard good things are on the horizon for batteries. The future is bright.

Comment by John Arne Birkeland on April 23, 2011 at 5:29am
MarcS: Ah. Explains a lot, like why the stall out with the first heavy prototype was a controlled one etc  :) I think the reason they did not add the vertical stabilizer in the first plance, is that they where aiming for as close to the original as possible. And last time I checked seagulls don't have a rudder.. :)  If you look at the tail it is shaped like a inverted v tail, to give you some directional stability. But a real seagull controls it's flight my using the whole body, so I guess there is not enough movement available to recreate that in this model.


You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

© 2019   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service