Comment by Nikola Rabchevsky on September 15, 2016 at 6:44pm

@Olivier WIth regards to battery life, I'm thinking of the Solo with it's stock GPS taking a lot longer than it should to get an initial fix.  As for update rate, if your movements are slow and smooth, the INS code can make decent predictions but if you're traveling very fast with abrupt changes in direction, you need things to run a lot faster.  It boils down to your use-case.  High-end INS systems (in the several thousand dollar range and up) have position updates at 40 or 50 Hz.  Consider trying to execute a high-speed 90-degree turn in a fraction of a second.

Comment by Jose Alberto Soler on September 16, 2016 at 1:19am

What is the easiest way to give this board corrections from a virtual RTK station? Here in Spain they are widely available and everyone is using those, no one uses real base and rover :)

I would love to implement this in surveying drones

Congrats on a great looking product

Comment by DROTEK on September 19, 2016 at 11:45am

@Satyabrata Satapathy :

Sorry for the delay, we have been working this week-end to add another fully integrated version. Please have a look at our Indiegogo campaign.

@AJ152 : 

We have added some basic documentation on our website. Rover module is already compatible with Pixhawk (driver is the same). Differential data encapsulation from base in MAVLink protocol is work in progress. However it is already possible to have it fully functional with a dedicated datalink (see our documentation).

Comment by DROTEK on September 19, 2016 at 11:49am

@Jose : 

What messages can your correction service provide? M8P works with RTCM 1005, 1077 and 1087 by default for GPS and GLONASS (it has also BEIDOU), and u-blox will probably extend compatibility to other messages. Do you usually work over 3G connection?

Comment by Erotokritos Nikou on February 11, 2017 at 1:04pm

ppk is not possible?

with that not needed to online transfer data.

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page