Replies to This Discussion

DeveloperPermalink Reply by Marco Robustini on November 28, 2011 at 10:20am

Some users crashing with 2.0.50/52, stay on 2.0.48/49 (IMHO).
I like the planned missions/auto-mode, fantastic feature for me, but i upgrade my board only when the code is more stable and tested.

• ▶ Reply

DistributorPermalink Reply by Dany Thivierge on November 28, 2011 at 10:30am

@ seb,  doing the same kind of things you do and I have made the switch to 2.0.50 

works great and no crash... although just like Bobo67 mentionned if you have a version that works great for you then you can stick to it until we iron out all the little glitches... but where would be the fun?  hehe

 

Dany - www.canadadrones.com

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff Cartwright on November 28, 2011 at 11:53am

if you like how it is now I would keep it... seems to be a few glitches still

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ted Van Slyck on November 28, 2011 at 3:59pm

my alt hold 2.050 is so good, its worth the switch. you just have to be very close to hovering before switching it on. I also had to cut in half throttle rate P and reduce alt hold P by about .1  I have a custom frame Quad. If you like alt hold, go for it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by seb on November 29, 2011 at 1:00am

Thanks guys !

Being a bit reluctant to tests the 'glitches' of a still 'under-testing' version (maybe related to the fact that I don't have an unlimited stock of replacement parts ;-) ), I think I will stick with my 2.0.49 for now and concentrate myself on a 'foldable design' I have in mind.

As I want to take my quad with me on walking/ski-touring/mountainbiking tours, I am currently trying to design a custom frame able to replace the stock frame (for me from JRDrones) and transform it into a foldable device (certainly based on already existing designs shown here). My idea is to keep as much 'stock parts' as possible, making it a true 'replacement' frame for people already owning 'stock' devices.

As soon as a CAD exists, I will present it to you for 'critics' :-)

Cheers !

Seb

• ▶ Reply