Is there a reasonably objective site I can compare RC suitable cameras? I made the mistake of purchasing a flycamone (v2 I think) and I have to admit -the quality is awful . We had a downed plane in a load of gorse bushes near our site and I thought I would take the opportunity to plug in a few waypoints and fly the plane over but the picture is just so foggy blurred and ... well ... not really that good unless the subject is about 2-3 meters away ...
What I am looking for is a reasonable comparison of :
Manufacturer, Make (date of product run), cost, weight, power source, power consumption, control options (ie through server channels etc), gimbal attachment details, img size + quality, vid size+ quality, storage mechanism, oh and a few links to a few sample images, youtubes etc etc. IS THAT TOO MUCH TOO ASK ? If it doesn't exist, I'll sling one up on a googledoc somewhere for all to add to. Otherwise I'll have to just tape my phone to the airframe !!
I just want to make sure that the next one I buy is usable and not gimmicky ...
Thanks
Permalink Reply by Juan Carlos Hdez on September 11, 2012 at 8:53am I think the best site is youtube.
Search comparisons between gropro hero vs gopro hero 2 vs rd32 II vs crocolis HD vs hobbyking HD wing II vs ION air PRO...
be careful with rd32II and hobbyking HD wing. people says that cause interferences.
Permalink Reply by Richard Green on September 12, 2012 at 3:47am Thanks for the initial list... I have started a google doc (any readers - feel free to edit, add to: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At_wjzWtUlyjdFlBcnNBZz... )
Permalink Reply by Juan Carlos Hdez on September 15, 2012 at 10:32am I've added some coments about rd32 II
Permalink Reply by Richard Green on September 20, 2012 at 5:47am Well that didn't take long to get vandalized ...
Thanks whoever replaced most of the cells with a 2 (not).
I'll have to revert it to read only access by default and if you want to contribute then I'll add people on a request basis.
I'll revert it to a previous version shortly.

I have a Swann Frestyle HD, It is a Gopro type camera and it seems to take decent video on my quad at 720p/60fps there is some artifacting due to vibration at WOT but all in all is not bad. I picked mine up as a woot for about $125. And it has a freaking lazer beam, remote and removable screen all included. The lazer points center of frame for aiming the camera.
Video Format
|
Video Format MPEG4 Codec, MOV File Format |
Resolution
|
1080p (1920 X 1080) 30fps 720p (1280 X 720) 60fps |
Photo Format
|
JPEG |
Photo Resolution
|
Photo Resolution 8MP / 5MP / 3MP |
Capture Mode
|
Single Shot, Continuous every 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 secs, self timer every 0, 5, 10 secs |
Optics
|
135 Degree angle view at 1080p resolution 170 Degree angle view at 720p resolution |
| Audio | |
Microphone
|
Yes - Built in |
Audio Format
|
Stereo 48kHZ, AAC compression |
| Recording | |
Storage Type
|
MicroSD Card (not included) |
Storage Capacity
|
Up to 32GB |
| General | |
Record Time
|
Up to 2.5 Hours per charge |
Battery Type
|
Rechargeable Lithium-ion (1000mAh) |
Charge Method
|
USB (computer or charger) |
Dimensions
|
2.36" x 2" x 1.6" / 60mm x 51mm x 42mm |
Weight
|
2.9oz / 82g (without screen) |
Permalink Reply by Luke Olson on September 25, 2012 at 12:48pm If you're interested in image quality the GoPro HD HERO2 is pretty much as good as it gets in the compact size range. To get better than that you'll have to look at larger cameras with larger sensors and better lenses. I haven't seen a complete roundup before but I suppose doing so is hard to justify for such a niche audience.
Permalink Reply by Stephen R Mann on September 28, 2012 at 9:24pm Check out sony's answer to the GoPro:

The #16 v2 seems pretty good for $40, I have one en-route (http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1556994) one must just isolate against vibration due to the jello effect from the CMOS sensor, I've done lots of research trying to find something reasonable and for quality image the GoPro are still great if you don't mind the very wide angle. Canon S95 (has CCD sensor) is a very good P&S camera for aerial use.
If you have some time to trawl for info then the Aerial Photography (http://www.rcgroups.com/aerial-photography-128) and Video Piloting (http://www.rcgroups.com/video-piloting-fpv-rpv-469/) forums can be useful.
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.1287 members
125 members
39 members
4 members
24 members
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by
