We Do Not Need Flying Delivery Drones, Just Smarter Ground Robots

By John O'Donnell

This is a guest post. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent positions of IEEE Spectrum or the IEEE.

While the idea of an Amazon Prime Air drone dropping onto my doorstep and delivering my ... might seem fun and cool, the reality is it simply may not be needed.

The only reason delivery trucks—such as the large brown trucks we see everywhere—only deliver to me around 4 p.m. each day is simply the time taken for one driver to take each parcel to an address. I call this one at a time parcel delivery. It's the same story for the USPS service. Each day our excellent delivery guy comes to our neighborhood and then spends a long time going door to door.

Imagine if he could deliver to every house at the same time. This would mean he could do multiple delivery runs each day. And in the case of the brown truck, it would mean that when my new purchase arrives at my local distribution center at, say, 2 p.m., it would be actually delivered the same day. That would be possible because our new fast delivery service would return to the distribution center and pick up another load, since now it can deliver to many houses at the same time (at least in a residential area).

But how can this be achieved? Let me say that no flying machines are needed! Instead we just need a new style of truck—one that carries a fleet of robotic delivery vehicles. In this scenario the driver would park in the middle of the neighborhood and then hit "deploy." All the robotic vehicles in his truck would already have self loaded their parcels and, after the doors open, they would scurry out to their addresses to drop the parcels, then return to the truck.

In this scenario, there are no flying robots involved; the robots needed would either be on wheels, tracks, or perhaps legs such as those from Boston Dynamics.

You could imagine the truck goes to the start of a street and deploys these mini vehicles. It then drives to the end of the street and picks them all up. The truck might even just drive slowly down the street and the robotic vehicles would deploy and return while the vehicle is moving. The point would be to empower the delivery driver to be able to handle way more parcel deliveries each day and therefore increase the number of possible deliveries.

In the case of large or heavy packages, you would have multiple robots carry them to the doorstep. Instead of robots of different sizes, I would propose a single size of robotic delivery vehicle that could then combine with others to increase load carrying ability.

Yes, we would all like to receive a package 30 minutes after ordering, but the best start could be to take our current delivery systems and enable the drivers to be able to deliver much faster and multiple times through the day.

The delivery guy of the future, instead of being just the guy who drops a package on your doorstep, could actually be a robotic specialist in control of his own fleet of robots.

Perhaps my son, who took delivery of his own Lego Mindstorms EV3 system this Christmas, will start working on a prototype.

Views: 655

Tags: Air, Amazon, IEEE, Prime, drone, ground, robots


Admin
Comment by Thomas J Coyle III on January 8, 2014 at 9:20am

This is an author that shares my viewpoint too:-)

TCIII ArduRover2 Developer

Comment by Zidlov on January 8, 2014 at 10:19am

One question only, independent of amazon or postal services wanna use drones or robots like you describe:

What holds people back catching those robots/drones, put them in their trunk and sell their parts on ebay?

I probably miss a point here. Also, what prevents a "delivery drone" from cutting out my eyes when I inadvertedly step out my front door the same moment one of them "drops" a package in my yard. And- last but not least-

how does the drone/robot get my signature to ensure to the postal service I got the parcel and not the neighbour's kid who just had to jump across the fence to pick it up?

Comment by Gary McCray on January 8, 2014 at 11:56am

I too think that there are a lot of tasks much better suited to ground robots rather than flying ones.

It is interesting that initially at least it was easier to solve point to point movement by getting far enough off the ground to where obstacles weren't so much of a problem and GPS could be sufficient.

But now as we begin developing better obstacle detection and avoidance and ground relative path following systems things may start coming back "down to Earth".

Comment by Jack Crossfire on January 8, 2014 at 1:15pm

So 3D Robotics is going to offer a Hobbyking car?

Comment by Phill Scott on January 8, 2014 at 5:17pm

What holds people back? The basic fact that it's theft holds most people back.  What holds people back from stealing an unattended delivery truck?

One of the comments on the original link sums up why using ground robots has it's fair share of problems.

There are many useful services that unmanned vehicles can provide to the general public, but there has to be a realisation that the current drones available aren't gonna cut it.

Comment by Mustafa TULU on January 8, 2014 at 5:41pm
I respectfully disagree. Yes flying is much more challenging but it solves many questions at the same time in terms of process from carrier to customer.

First of first, gps accuracy is limited to public access. You can compansate this limitation when flying with IMU fusions with cost effectively,however; to drive a robot at ground with just gps is not enough, you should at least need a very expensive laser scanner, multiple stereo cameras and a very powerfull onboard computation. As you go through all of this you increase size, weight and cost.

Second handicap for ground vehicle is that, there are many many variables at ground than air like moving objects animals road obstacles cars, bikes, traffic lamps, people, crazy people etc. It's a very hard task to consider all of that, make a stable hardware that won't fail.

I am not even mentioning the risk factor and damage will caused by people. You can imagine by yourself a very embarrassing scene that people who throwing eggs or so.

In conclusion, ground veihicles are not cost effective(dramatically) than aerial vehicles(this is the only big concern for carrier or company). Ground veichles has more variables to concern than air vehicles, Air vehicles are size and weight effective than ground vehicles.And for my opinion air vehicles are much more advanced these days than ground vehicles when the task accomplishment is concern.

Comment

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

© 2014   Created by Chris Anderson.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service