I'm CEO of 3D Robotics and founder of DIY Drones. I'm the former Editor in Chief of Wired Magazine, author of The Long Tail (Hyperion, 2006), FREE (Hyperion, 2009) and Makers (Crown, 2012) and founder of GeekDad.com
"True I guess I will stay indoors for a couple of days till it's safe. The only thing I am worried about is everyone knows I fly, I bet I will have a line of guys saying "Can you fix it?" and the repair service starts...I…"
"@Shawn, I agree. This year will be drones under the tree. Next year will find Santa using drones for delivery. To quote Bob Dylan, "the times, they are a-changing."
@ Gary, I love Parks and Rec too. I can't imagine how Ron will…"
"Brandin (and others), Thanks for the constructive criticism. I wouldn't expect anything less for from this community.
We are certainly aware that we haven't created something absolutely new - but does anyone do that?…"
"No offense, but... This has been done before and better. To my knowledge, and anyone please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, the "quadshot" (http://transition-robotics.com/) was the 1st transitioning UAV sold to the general…"
"And, I hadn't seen the wind commentary. Yes, this is one of the big problems with transitioning VTOLs.
I assume when hovering in 30 mph wind, you pretty much have to have the nose pointed upwind? How much wind can it tolerate while…"
"I'll start with saying nice job, I envy your drive to get this off the ground and hope your project is successful!.
And as you should probably have expected from this site, and you have already received from other members, here are my criticism…"
"JD, I agree with that datapoint. But a 152 is optimized to be an airplane. The Xplusone is compromised for VTOL. It has 3 extra motors, huge vertical surface which is not necessary, etc. And while wingborne flight tends to…"
"Any time you can leverage the aerodynamic advantage of a large wing, as opposed to supporting the craft with the engine power alone (and a small spinning wing), it will result in greater efficiency. This is one reason a helicopter consumes…"
"I can't Rob. I don't mean to say that it is in general more efficient than a quad. But at 60 mph, I would guess that it is probably more efficient to hit that speed in the form of an aircraft such as the xplusone, than a traditional…"
"I love seeing this type of stuff! I always think about the Ryan X-14 and the XFY Pogo and how cool those designs would have been with more advanced avionics and of course, electric engines in the case of the Pogo... "
"You can not compare this to a quadcopter or a fixed wing. That would be like comparing a quadcopter to a fixed wing. You have to compare it to past designs similar to this, and based on that it looks extremely good so far. Yes, you can fly that fast…"
I just read your post on UAVs and I'm wondering if there's anywhere that one could purchase a pre-made UAV...couldn't find one on ebay.
I run a network of websites, www.ballerhouse.com, and am considering featuring a UAV article. Can you point me in the direction of where someone could purchase one? If so, what other info should my readers know?
The cheapest commercial one is around $7,000 (cropcam.com). The cheapest *good* one is around $10,000 (http://www.procerusuav.com/). That's why we started this site, to bring the price down below $1,000.
We're *DIY* Drones--buying one premade isn't the point ;-)
If you want to do a Q&A with me, that would be fine.
The reason for the board is that my son and I thought it would be fun to build our own board, develop theory, and write firmware. We were inspired by Maynard Hill, who came to town and gave a talk.
We got our feet wet with a rapid-prototyping board mounted on an RC truck, and then build our own board for a sailplane. We bought our parts from SparkFun. Nathan Seidle, the ownder of Sparkfun, asked me what we were doing, I told him, he offered to build a surface mount board for me.
My son and I spent a few delightful summers getting the firmware working. At the time, our goal was to play, to just do some interesting things with it, without any goal in mind. When we were done, we had something that worked to our satisfaction, Nathan asked if he could sell it, we gave him permission.
We recognized that what we had was not a full-fletched autopilot, but that it might be interesting to anyone wanting to tinker with the controller. They could build on our firmware, if they wanted, or start from stratch, if they were ambitious.
By the way, the main reason we used assembly language was that my son had never written any, and he wanted to learn. He had used lots of other languages, but not assembly.
As far as what people are doing with my board, you probably have more information than I have!! The only person I've talked to so far is a member of diydrones. All I know is that the board is selling well at SparkFun, with no complaints.
By the way, the reason the board has been backordered for so long is that the vendor of the GPS replaced their ET301 with an ET312 at the same time that SparkFun was automating their board production, resulting in some defective boards. Even after we worked out the hardware problems, there was a subtle change in the ET312 that caused some problems. Every board that SparkFun builds is tested with the full firmware running, and the boards were not passing. We finally figured out what was wrong, production is resumed, I guess they are catching up on backorders.
All of the work my son and I was deliberately done in a vacuum...we didn't do any research on what other people were doing. We made some mistakes (that was the point) and had some fun.
My background is an electrical engineer with strengths in control theory, mathematics, and theory of flight.
I work at GE's research labs, I've been there for 33 years.
You might want to do a Google on "William Premerlani" to see what I have been up to. Much of it has to do with software development...you gave me a good chuckle when you said in your review that you wondered why we hadn't used C...the answer is, it would have been too easy!!!
I won honorable mention, best in category, best in engineering, 550$, and an internship offer, at the state science & engineering fair. (The winners were a guy who did computer simulations of bird flu epidemics to determine the best method to distribute a limited supply of antivirals, a girl who developed an advanced, complex robotic vision algorithm which could detect blobs in foggy areas and high altitude ranges, and a guy who figured out a method to stem the growth of certain forms of cancer, so it was a humbling experience).
I just wanted to thank you for making this website and for your great documention and projects, because without them I'd probably still be trying to figure out how to connect the GPS receiver to the Stamp.
Been following along for some time (geekdad) and just bought a Blubberbot for something to do over the summer holidays... thinking about the project possibilities for my kids in electronics 11/12 ... hmmm blimp racing? Anyway, great to be here.