3DR frame feedback

Hey All,

I've been flying on the new 3DR frame for a couple of weeks now with an hour or so of flight time and have collected my feedback on the frame.

Battery Mounting

The strap that comes with the frame designed to hold the battery is poor. Mine just ripped off during flight causing the quad to fly out of control and crash. The strap ripped, it didnt come undone, the velcro is nice and strong. I was out flying and was performing some quite harsh manoeuvres to test the handling limits and the battery ripped free - totally unacceptable, frankly.

Only having one strap to hold a 300g 3s LiPo is not enough, there is lots of movement even when the strap is done up very tight. I normally use an additional elastic band or two to keep dangerous play to a minimum.

My previous frame had an enclosure for the battery so there was no play at all when mounted. This provided for much more stable flight and also allowed far easier mounting of cameras under the quad.

Electronics stack/housing

While the design of the actual flat boards to mount the electronics on is excellent (lots of places for cable ties to attach boards and other bits and pieces) the spacers and screws used to hold it all together are too weak and the threads degrade too quickly. I would highly recommend using metal (or at least a much harder plastic) spacers and screws at the cost of maybe 10-15g.

Legs

The L shape of the legs means there is a huge amount of stress at the corner during any rough landing with any horizontal movement. I've snapped all the legs already over three crashes. They perform very well when taking vertical load and as the demo video in the car park shows, can easily withstand a drop of a couple of metres onto concrete.

My suggestion would be to totally, or mostly, eliminate the L shape and move the mounting holes further out.

Camera mounting

Apart from on top of the electronics stack, there's nowhere to easily mount a camera without quite a lot of engineering work to make a frame that can span the battery.

General flight performance

Without a camera and with the battery firmly mounted, my quad flies very well and is good fun. It's a huge improvement on my last frame. I also end up having to dig out bits of field from the ends of the motor mounts after a rough landing as they effectively scoop up mug and grass :) That's my fault for flying like a nutter, though.

The actual motor mounts and main airframe are rock solid and vibration, even without rubber mounts for the main board, is low enough to fly with no problems.

Overall, I like the frame but feel the points outlined above need addressing in future versions with the legs and battery mount being the most important.

I appreciate that none of these problems would exist if I flew my quad in a windless hangar with a foam floor, but that's clearly unrealistic and these frames should be a bit tougher.

I'd like to hear other's feedback on the frame as I've only had it a couple of weeks and am a relative novice in the field.

Cheers,

David

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Got a 3DR since 2 weeks now, hard for me to compare, as its my first Quad. On the Battery Mounting I see the same problems, I added additional velcro between frame and battery and additionally use some rubber band (better save then sorry).

    For the legs, I oust broke 3 of them, but to be fair, the quad dropped in free fall from 70 meters and the legs were the only thing that broke, so great durability on the rest of the frame.

    I also replaced some of the nylon screws as they were to weak.

    All in all I'm very satisfied with my first quad and it would be boring if there was no space for enhancements.

  • I just started with the 3dr frame myself, Dave its not crash proof bro. Although I do agree that the battery does need at least 2 straps and the plastic stand-offs need to be stronger or metal. I stripped one out building my frame. As for the legs go I haven't had any problems. Practice your landings. All in all the battery needs 2 straps and the plastic stand offs need to be stronger. I have been thinking about incasing my electronics with a foam shell to spice it up and protect them from crashes.
This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @gclue_akira: 柏の葉で走行させてるjetracerの中身 #instantNeRF #jetracer https://t.co/giVvuE4hP7
Jul 4
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Cool web-based self-driving simulator. Click save when the AI does the right thing https://github.com/pncsoares/self-driving-car
Jul 4
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @donkey_car: Human-scale Donkey Car! Hope this makes it to a @diyrobocars race https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMaf031U8jg
Jun 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Jun 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Jun 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @GrantEMoe: I won my first @diyrobocars @donkey_car virtual race! Many thanks to @chr1sa @EllerbachMaxime @tawnkramer and everyone who m…
Jun 13
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @gclue_akira: JetRacerで自動走行したコースを、InstantNeRFで再構築。データセットは別々に収集 #jetracer #instantNeRT https://t.co/T8zjg3MFyO
Jun 13
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: SPC 3.0 Now the motor also works. This car is doable. I just need to design a deck to mount my compute and sensors. http…
Jun 13
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: My new car SPC 3.0. https://t.co/CKtkZOxeNQ
Jun 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: High speed at @diyrobocars thanks @EdwardM26321707 for sharing the video https://t.co/o4317Y2U1S
Jun 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Today at @RAMS_RC_Club for @diyrobocars. Used @emlid RTK GPS and @adafruit @BoschGlobal IMU. Lap time 28s https://t.co/R…
May 28
DIY Robocars via Twitter
May 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
May 14
DIY Robocars via Twitter
May 13
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @f1tenth: Say hi to our newest #F1TENTH creation for @ieee_ras_icra next week in Philly. It’s going to be huge! 😎 🔥 @AutowareFdn @PennEn…
May 13
DIY Robocars via Twitter
May 11
More…