AC3.2.1 APM 2.5 Throttle pulsates in Loiter

Hi.

I have a problem after updating AC to 3.2.1 from 3.1.5.

When in Loiter, the the speed of the motors rev up and down/pulsate quite rapidly. This was working fine when I was using previous versions of arducopter.

I have downloaded the logs, and have looked into accX, accY and accZ. These seems to be inside the range specified in the wiki at arducopter. (Log_vibrations.bin)

Please have a look at the Log.bin, and note the difference between ThrIn and ThrOut when I'm in Loiter mode.

 

Anyone having any idea what the problem may be?

Log.bin

Log_Vibration.bin

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • As my quad never pulsates while hovering but does it while there are pitch or roll inputs (it loses hight dramatically and pulsates till it reaches correct hight again), I suggest fast forward-backward and left right maneuvers for the test

        For the analysis it might be also important if there was wind or not. Perhaps strong wind makes it worse. (I am not sure, because in our region it's always windy... :()

  • I guess there are two ways of resolving present problem:

    1. Cutting out something and trying to fit in EKF part into 3.2.* firmware.

    2. Return to 3.1.5 way of estimation, because 3.2.1 is not better at all. In fact 3.2.1 is worse than 3.1.5 because it's just not flying right. It was transitional buld from 3.1.5 to 3.3 with EKF (hope EKF helps after all), it was bad idea to leave it "last stable for APM boards".

    I admit, that if you have no vibrations (for example on small drones with high kV motors), 3.2.1 behaves satisfactory, but if you run bigger drone it becoming a headache "catch the vibration".

    Migrating to Pixhawk is not an option cause if this is the way problems are resolved I'd rather migrate to another project like dji, paparazzi or openpilot.

    I'm sorry to complain, but it is really irritating, I haven't had so much trouble with controller because of vibrations ever and this included newly developed boards that didn't want to fly at all and needed to be tuned.

    It's time to make decisions, at least I'll waste no time hoping it will get better.

    • I have to admit I am somewhat frustrated too.

      I have been working on my first build for the last three months and I am still experiencing these problems, despite going to huge lengths to minimise vibrations (which I have now reduced to about 0.1g.) In that time, I have iterated through four different types of propeller, swapped out the motors, stripped down and reconfigured the quad in various ways. And yet the net result in flight behaviour has been minimal. In other words, the main underlying problem still remains. At this point, simply through the process of elimination, the likely cause is the flight controller.

      What concerns me is that there is not much consensus on a solution, other than downgrading to 3.1.5. Unfortunately I can't even do that because Mission Planner is throwing an error and I am unsure which hex file to download from the history of daily builds. Nor do I want to install the Arduino tool chain (with specially configured gcc) and build it from source.

      If I were to do things again I would have just gone for a Pixhawk. That seems the safer bet. Unfortunately I have already spent several times what I intended to at the outset. I am very wary about throwing good money after bad.

      Building a quadcopter scratch is not for everybody, but at the same time, I really don't think what I have experienced is normal... I get the impression most people have a much smoother experience.

      • Well, downgrade is pretty simple:

        3702693352?profile=original

        • Indeed, that is what I have tried, but I am getting this error when attempting to download previous firmwares:

          3702782415?profile=original

          3702782336?profile=original

          This is from Mission Planner 1.3.24 build 1.1.5574.33902 running within a VMWare VM on my MacBook Pro. Unfortunately APM Planner doesn't allow you to download old firmware yet.

  • I don´t know exactly, wether my experience has the same reason, but perhaps it can help someone - 

    i have a 3dr Y6B with larger props and motors - the upper props are only 10 cm away from the pixhawk. When flying without the canopy the copter is very unstable especially in height - it bounces up and down about 2m. When I fly it with the canopy it hold heigh very stable even in gustling wind. Also the when braking from fast forward flying it doesn´drop as much as it does without the canopy. In the log i did the first part without, the second part with the canopy.

    3701979490?profile=originalI have no exact explanation, but the canopy solved the stability problems for me.

    2015-04-11 18-54-17.bin

    • Perhaps your props near controller are affecting the pressure

      3702559602?profile=original

      • I´m sure the props will affect the pressure above the copter - I thought that´s the reason for flying :-) .

        My idea is that the reason for the copter drifting up and down is some kind of resonance in the control loop: 

        Copter drops - pressure goes up - throttle is increased - pressure goes down because of prop effect (not height)  - throttle is decreased, but copter is not really climbing ...

        As you can see from the GPS the peaks in the pressure are not only caused by the props but also by height.

        Anyway, with the canopy mounted the problem is solved.

      • APM 2.6 3.21 firmware 810KV 10x4.5 Deadcat frame 3 Cell

        Same problem as everyone here. Made two flights today one early with wind second flight late with very little wind. No changes to Quad between flights. My second flight was 90% better then the first. WHY ?

        Any help take a look at my logs  

         

  • Please guys, as Rob says, always report issues with logs so developers can check if there is a firmware issue or an user one, that helps us to have a better code to enjoy our flyes ;) ; I grumble a lot with this problem but only on one cuad and it was a sum of problems on my cuad, developers report that the next release is going to be less sensible to vibs but only for Pixhawk.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

Neville Rodrigues liked Neville Rodrigues's profile
Jun 30
Santiago Perez liked Santiago Perez's profile
Jun 21
More…