Autonomous "Vertical" Missions In Mission Planner?

Greetings: I am using a 3DR X8, Pixhawk with a NEX5 for standard mapping/photogrammetry. I want to map a cliff face. Is it possible to create an autonomous flight in Mission Planner that will photograph the face in a grid-style pattern up-down and left to right (or vice versa) with the same kind of image overlap that you can do on a vertical mapping project? Think photogrammetry turned sideways to map in a vertical plane as opposed to the normal horizontal plane.

I can use a gimbal set at 90 degrees and create the waypoints fairly parallel to the face but can't figure out the up/down part at a specific waypoint. I have seen this done with oblique images that are manipulated in specialized software (EG PIX4D) but not with images taken parallel to an object in an 'up-down' format.

All help gratefully appreciated and accepted.

Marshall

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Replies

    • Steve: That's exactly how I was thinking about it at first and, in fact, that's essentially what I'd be doing.

      For me the trick will be to have multiple 'vertical' images taken at the same waypoint (ie as the UAV climbs vertically).

      Any ideas how to do that in Mission Planner? Also camera trigger... a vertical climb would show no distance traveled if triggering the camera by distance. So I'm thinking a trigger by time and trying to control the rate of climb? Not sure yet...

      Will be using PhotoModeler (http://www.photomodeler.com/) software as it handle near field images very well.

      Will keep everyone in the loop as I work it out.

      M

      • Marshall,

        You will need to travel back and forth along the wall as you climb up in altitude.  This way it will be a new waypoint so you can trigger a picture.  You will need to add a false point at the end of every other flight line so you actually travel to a new point, instead of just straight vertical.

        Triggering by time and setting the climb rate might work too...

        I'm also interested in what flight times you are getting with the 3DR X8 and the NEX5.  With which gimbal too?

        Thanks and best,

        Steve

        • Sreve: Temporarily I will use a GoPro 3 Black because that's the only gimbal/camera combo I can use. The NEX won't be on a gimbal because I want to make sure the idea works before I drop that amount of cash for a gimbal to hold the NEX.

          If you have any suggestions for an NEX gimbal... It doesn't need to be massively fancy. I am concerned about weight and flight times when I get to that stage. I have heard that the X8 is a tad weak in that department.

          Appreciate the replies. I will be on the road for the next few weeks for work so 'developments' will be slow but will do and post what I can.

          Best,

          Marshall

  • Marshall,

    I would set it up like a typical mapping mission but, as you said, "turned sideways".

    So your distance to the vertical cliff face would be your height above ground.  This way you can calculate your image footprint and make sure you have good overlap.

    Your altitude difference between a set a images would equate to distance from image center to image center (this would be the up-down you were asking about).

    In essence you would have a bunch of photographs in a straight line, parallel to the cliff face, all taken at different altitudes and stacked on top of each other (if viewed from the top down in mission planner).

    You may need to fake the software you use for stitching by putting in a "local" coordinate system and it will stitch together the images as if viewed from above.  Only it would really be viewed from the side.

    Does that make sense?

    I'm also interested in what flight time you are getting with the X8 and the NEX5.  With which gimbal too?

    Interesting project, please keep us updated on how it progresses.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
Apr 27
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Apr 27
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @f1tenth: Sliding (autonomously) into the weekend like ... 🤖😎 #f1tenth #robots #AutonomousVehicles @OpenRoboticsOrg @NVIDIAEmbedded @Aut…
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: One of the problems with autonomous car racing is that watching software drive is not a very exciting spectator sport. To help…
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Replaced AGX Xavier with @NVIDIAEmbedded Jetson Xavier NX. Now both cars look fast and clean https://t.co/jlcoY2EjZf
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Yesterday we had a record number of competitors (36) in our monthly @DIYRobocars virtual autonomous car race. We kept it going…
Apr 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Apr 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: After more than a year of only virtual races, @DIYRobocars returns to the newly renovated @circuitlaunch on May 22 for the resu…
Apr 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: And now available with LiDAR 🔥 https://twitter.com/Heavy02011/status/1381137016381964293
Apr 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Heavy02011: #VirtualRaceLeague: @DIYRobocars Race #9 - #ParkingLotNerds #thunderhillracetrack, CA Join us for the next race April 24th,…
Apr 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DWalmroth: Weather's finally cooperating, looking forward to racing 1:10 scale autonomous cars outdoors again! @diyrobocars, @NVIDIAEm…
Apr 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @AIDRI_: I finally succeeded in optimizing the trajectory and speed of a car on a #racetrack. Next step: implement a 2d controller and…
Apr 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
@jetdillo @circuitlaunch Actually the second *in person* event in a year. We do virtual races every month
Apr 2
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Update: we're moving it back one day to Sunday (the 4th) at 11:00am instead
Apr 2
DIY Robocars via Twitter
@GrantEMoe @circuitlaunch Update: we're doing it on Sunday (4th) at 11:00am instead
Apr 2
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Maybe we should have a mini @DIYRobocars race in our lower school's playground https://t.co/xLFeua1R6X
Mar 29
More…