Hi all,

I have built a arducopter a few years ago end 2012, but I encountered some problems and left it there (and also for other personal reasons) till now.

It was with the APM 2.0 board. Now I'm trying to catch up and I've seen that, apart from APM 2.5 e 2.6, there are also other boards around, like Pixhawk and PX4.

So, first question was: can I still run arducopter 3.1 (and 3.2 when it will be available) on my APM board 2.0?

Second question is: how are the 3 boards different (in term of functionalities)?

Actually one bonus question: is the APM Planner that runs on Mac usable as only planner, or would I still need a Win box (or VM in Mac) to run the normal mission planner?

Thank you

Simone

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • 3.1.5 works well for me with no problems.

     

    • Thank you

      • You may want to upgrade the GPS if you haven't already.  That was the largest performance upgrade I did to my APM 2.0 board - disabling the on board Mediatek GPS and using the external ublox unit.  Huge performance difference for loiter on my copter.

        I never had issues with the onboard compass for my configuration.

        • I think I have a separate compass but not a separate GPS. I'll look into this.

          I remember the problem I had was the copter heavily drifting to one side even indoors instead of raising straight... I guess probably a calibration problem or a unbalanced frame.

  • T3
    First, I believe you can run 3.1. Only way to know for sure is try an load it.
    Second, PX4 and PIXHAWK are similar. PixHawk is the most advance board with more processor power and ram and loads of io. PX4 was an intern board. The APM 2.6 is a slightly more advanced then the APM 2 with and external compass and GPS.
    Third, the Mac Planner is almost in par with the windows Mission Planner.
    • thank you.

      I guess I can still try restarting the thing with the old hw I had, and then see if makes sense to move to a newer platform

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
Sep 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: We've got another virtual @DIYRobocars race tomorrow at 9:00am PT. Two dozen autonomous cars will compete, four at a time. Ther…
Sep 4
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Sep 1
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Aug 31
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Aug 31
sam liked Jimmy Oliver's profile
Aug 25
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @ExplorerRobocar: Sometimes, I am really a big kid!! Having fun with my virtual RC car on the @diyrobocars track 😜😉, by using the « AR R…
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @grepLeigh: @donkey_car @unity3d @TensorFlow ~1050 episodes into training, my agent learned to erratically drive in the left lane. 🤖😆 ht…
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @EclipseCyclone: Sweet! http://Robotec.ai high performance #ROS 2 @unity3d #CycloneDDS bridge for @AutowareFdn @SVLSimulator now…
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: My car had a lot of trouble getting around the track at the last @diyrobocars event -- only one actual finished lap during the r…
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: This is the run time map https://t.co/VzykOkUt2G
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Made a lot progress on Warm Spring Raceways track. Almost finished one lap. https://t.co/nUVpufZQyP
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @AntonioRobotics: Super fun time seeing these autonomous cars race at @circuitlaunch for the @diyrobocars quarterly meet up! The demolit…
Aug 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: I thought my dumb localization code was still working at the new @circuitlaunch track, but it was just *barely* working. I shoul…
Aug 14
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: Recording of entire in person @diyrobocars race today @circuitlaunch. Fast forward a couple hours to go straight to the racin…
Aug 14
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: This is the run time map. Very noisy Lidar signal https://t.co/bAbeVUMi10
Aug 14
More…