Part Two: Here is the original picture of the finished product:

3689618661?profile=original

This is the second part of a 2-part series on 'How to build a High-Definition FPV UAV using a Raspberry PI with HD camera, using a high speed WiFi link.

In my first post on the subject (located here), I discussed the parts I used, and how to install them into a Hobby King Go-Discover FPV model. 

In this post, I will discuss installing the Raspberry PI and the PI camera in the Go-Discover gimbals, and the software configuration for both the Raspberry PI and the ground station PC.

From the previous post, step 3 was completed by installing the Ubiquity Rocket M5 in the model.  Now onto step 4:

Step 4: Install the Raspberry PI and PI Camera

Here is a photo of the position of the PI in the Go-Discover model:

3689618887?profile=original

The PI fits nicely just behind the camera gimbals, with the USB and HDMI ports on top. In the right side you can see the Cat5 network cable attached. This cable connects to the ethernet switch, which is also connected to the Rocket M5 input port.  

The two cables shown on top are the servo control wires for the gimbals, which I have directly connected to channel 4 and 5 on my radio.  I am using channel 4 (normally the rudder stick on my radio. Since there is no rudder on a flying wing, this is a convenient channel to use to move left and right with the camera. I have not (yet) moved to a head tracker, but if you already have that setup, just assign the channels accordingly.

To install the PI camera, remove the stock plate from the gimbals (for a GoPro), and mount the PI camera as shown in this photo:

3689618926?profile=original

The PI camera case fits very nicely into the slot, and again I used a small piece of velcro to hold it down. You could use a couple of small screws instead if you want a more secure hold.  The two gimbals servos are also shown here. They are simple to install, just follow the Go-Discover instructions.

Here is a front view of the PI camera installed:

3689618962?profile=original

Here is the block diagram describing all the connections:

3689618829?profile=original

Some comments on my previous post suggested that it is possible to eliminate the ethernet switch and serial-to-ethernet converter using the Raspberry PI and a serial port on the PI. I believe this post describes how to talk to the PI via the NavLink, but in this case, I want to use the PI to bridge the connection from the ground station to the APM/PixHawk. Somebody please comment on this if you know more about it.   I believe it would require a TCP/IP to serial link from the PI to the telemetry port on the APM, and some software on the PI to act as the bridge.  The main connection to the ground station is via the Rocket M5 and TCP/IP, not through a telemetry link (900 Mhz or Zigbee like I used on my other models).

Step 5: Getting it all to work with software configuration (the really fun part starts now).

Check out this post on what others have done with streaming and the PI.  My experiments showed that using GStreamer on both the PI and on Windows gives really good results with very low latency, if you use the right parameters. 

Get GStreamer on the PI by following this blog.   This is the same version of GStreamer that I am using on my setup. 

Make sure your PI camera works ok by plugging in the PI to a standard monitor using the HDMI port and follow the instructions on the Raspberry PI website on how to get the camera up and running (without GStreamer).  Once you have a working PI and camera, you can then proceed to stream things over the network.  

Note: It is suggested that you first get the PI streaming video by plugging it directly into your local network where you can also connect your ground station PC with the correct IP addresses (without the Rocket M5).   For my PI, I picked 192.168.1.2,  and for the ground station, 192.168.1.1.    Make sure you can ping the PI from your PC and the PC from the PI.  

For streaming, you will also have to make sure all the ports you intent to use are open on the firewall (described later).

For the ground station PC,  you can download GStreamer here.  Make sure when you install, select to install everything , or full installation (not the default). 

Here is the command I use for the PI to pipe the camera output to GStreamer:

raspivid -t 0 -w 1280 -h 720 -fps 30 -b 1700000 -o - | gst-launch1.0 -v fdsrc ! h264parse config-interval=1 ! rtph264pay ! udpsink host = 192.168.1.1 port= 9000

The command is explained as follows:

raspivid is the command to start the camera capture on the PI.  The -w switch is for the width in pixels, and the -h switch is for the height.  In this case, I am using 1280 X 720, but you can try any combination that fits your needs. 

The -b switch is the bit rate for the sampling. In this case I chose 1.7mbs to send over the stream. Again you can experiment with higher or lower values. This settings seems to work good for me, and the latency is almost unnoticeable.  

the "-o - |" is piping the output to gstreamer.  Make sure you include the dash before the pipe "|" symbol. 

For the GStreamer command, all the filters are separated with an exclamation point "!", as these are individual drivers that are part of GStreamer.  Since the PI has hardware accelerated video, the output is in a format called "H264", which is a highly-compressed stream. The GStreamer filters are configured to transport the output via a UDP socket connection to the target PC. Notice the 'udpsink' element which specifies the host - in this case your ground station, and the UDP port.  I am using port 9000, but you can use any open port on your system, but be sure to open the firewall or it won't work!  You can also use TCP instead of UDP, but for such a data stream, I chose to use UDP since dropouts are certainly possible, and with UDP this is ok, but with TCP, you could have socket problems and higher latency. 

Note: to get the PI to execute this command on boot, make a shell script with the above command and add it to your local.rc boot sequence. That way when the PI boots, you get the stream without having to log into the PI remotely. 

For the ground station PC, once you have installed GStreamer and opened the correct ports, use this command (from the command prompt) to view the stream:

c:\gstreamer\1.0\x86_64\bin\gst-launch-1.0 udpsrc port=9000 ! application/x-rtp,encoding-name=H264,payload=96 ! rtph264depay ! avdec_h264 ! videoconvert ! autovideosink

If all goes well, you should see the PI camera output on your PC screen in a popup window.  For those of you what want to use FPV goggles, you can connect to the HDMI port on your PC to display the output if your goggles support HDMI. 

I have this command in a batch file (with a PAUSE) statement at the end to keep the window open.

WHEW!  If you got this far, you are amazing. 

The last step to complete the build is to connect to the APM from mission planner.  The method I used to connect was to install a utility that converts a TCP connection to a virtual serial port, but I also think that directly connecting the mission planner to the TCP port will also work, however I have not tried it. I will post back later after trying it.

Here is the link to setup the serial to ethernet device to have an IP address and port.

Here is the link to the configuration utility for installing the virtual serial port.   

Once you have a serial connection over TCP/IP working to the APM, you should be able to connect with Mission Planner. On the maiden flight, it worked perfectly, and I didn't see a single drop in the telemetry data or anything noticeable in the video transmission, however my first flight was limited to 2km.

The last step is to connect the Rocket M5 to the Nano M5 and test everything using the OTA (over the air) connection. If all is well, you are ready to fly!  But be careful on your maiden, you just spent $700. 

Finally, here is a photo of my Antenna Tracker with the Nano M5 attached. My next update will include a video of a longer flight.  

3689618942?profile=original

Happy Flying!

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • @Steve, I have played with the tools, but can't give a detailed review.  Eventually, I will put the UAV in a test chamber and actually measure the TRP from both antennas. Just for fun. Then I can compare with the Ubiquity tools. I am trying to find the time to do this, but other things keep getting in the way - like real work. 

  • The odroid-w can still be bought from Germany
    http://www.pollin.de/shop/dt/OTQ2OTgxOTk-/Bausaetze_Module/Entwickl...
    You also need the connector pack
    http://www.pollin.de/shop/dt/NjQ2OTgxOTk-/Bausaetze_Module/Entwickl...
    And the docking board
    http://www.pollin.de/shop/dt/NzQ2OTgxOTk-/Bausaetze_Module/Entwickl...
    Too bad that broadcom stopped production of it.
    As Dom says its the same SOC so as I understand it its the same same as the RPI but in a smaller package.
    @John
    Seems like there is an 2.4 GHz antenna included in the A-52HPn but not in the A-5Hn.
    @Dom
    That wisp station looks really interesting, though they are out of stock now on msdist. Maybe you bought the last one :)
    @Patrick
    That sounds great. I guess I'll just have to try it out and see if it works.
  • I'm having a hard time finding the Mikrotik Sxt/groove you are using John..is this the SXT you are using: http://www.microcom.us/rbsxt5hpnd.html ? And which do you have in air vs ground? I can't seem to find US vendor that provides these at discount relative to Ubiquti. Also regarding firmware/OS are you able to do any spectrum analysis in 5ghz range like the ubiquti's claim? That is one nice feature about them as my spectrum analyzer only goes up to 3Ghz. I see the SXT guy has 1.2W output and groove has 500mw are these numbers better that Ubiq? I can't see to find datasheet to compare. And for someone with not much wifi knowledge does it really matter for this application whether its MIMO vs SISO? I guess this could drive whether you buy bullet/groove vs Nano..

    Patrick have you tried the spectrum analysis tools from Ubiquiti yet? Curious to know how well it works.

    thanks

  • You can solder an SMA connector to the footprint that is already on the board for a bullet m5.  The hard part is getting the old connector off, even with a good soldering iron most folks will likely fail.  The ones that I have done required two people and 5 soldering irons (actually 3 irons and one set of smd tweezers which was used as 2).  I hung the board up by a network cable then attached a weight (roll of solder) to the N connector then used all of the irons to heat the 4 contact points of the shell as well as the center pin and it will drop right off.  The N connector weighs 55g.

  • odroid-w looks perfect for this kind of application but unfortunately broadcom stepped into protect the raspberry and it's dead now.  it has the same SoC so will support h264 in hardware but doesn't have an ethernet.

    The £39 wispstation I just bought is only 24g, the spironet antenna 14g, the raspberry 30g, raspberry camera+cable 4g (!), and the hacked ethernet poe injector cable with lipo adapter another 15g which comes to a grand total of 87g.  The bullet m5 I bought for the other end is 155g alone - half of that is probably the ridiculously large N-connector!

    If you're flying planes or big camera ships then the extra weight is OK but for 'normal' quads or minis, weight and cost is at a premium.  Of course my option isn't MIMO but I'm hoping the single antenna will get me as far as I'd ever want to go anyway.  I'm sure everyone here has different requirements so as more people try different configurations and report back it will be great for everyone else.

    Thanks for the advice on the poe power, hacked/soldered an injector together this morning and works perfectly from a 3s lipo :)

  • @Nils  I don't think you need a tracker for such a short range if you use omni on both the UAV and ground. Does the Odroid-w have full hardward H264 support for the Pi Camera? It's looks very interesting.

  • Well, "Grooves" weight ~75g (w/o enclosure) and are doing their job nicely, that's all I can say.
    Antennas are overpriced I'd say. Isn't 6dBi antenna included in the package? 
    http://routerboard.com/RBGrooveA-52HPn (see at the very bottom).

  • They seem really nice and I'm leaning towards the MT grooves.

    What do you think of two A-5Hn with these antennas? 

  • I myself have chosen Mikrotik because was quite impressed by their firmware:
    online demo: http://demo.mt.lv/webfig/
    or Winbox demo: http://www.winbox-mikrotik.com/2013/07/winbox-emulater.html
    Also, one can download RouterOS virtual image, for i.e. getting ground station connected to home network via NATed GPRS/3G network. It supports all sorts of PPT connections out of the box. 

    WebFig
  • Oh, by the way ordered two Odroid-w a couple of days ago, http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G14061.... Same as the RPI but a lot smaller.

    You can still get them from Germany.

This reply was deleted.