100KM

techwing gets winglets and slots

Hey everyone,

 I wanted to post an update on the work I have been doing on the techwing design.

techwing01.jpg?w=835&width=600

The new design is scaled up some to a 40 inch WS. It also includes real Grantz type winglets, a longer tip cord and fixed LE slots.

Flat plate:

tip-vortex.jpg?w=900&width=600

 With winglets:

techwing13deg.jpg?w=766&width=600

By reducing the vortex, you can expect less drag, greater lift, and better stall characteristics.

The next thing I did was add fixed LE slots to the outboard panel. LE slots allow the wing to fly at much higher angle of attack .

This is the techwing at a 13 degree AoA. Dark blue is the most negative pressures.

techwing13degsurface.jpg?w=766&width=600

Here you can see the slotted airfoil at a 13 deg AoA. It achieves a 1.19 CL  normally this airfoil would have a Cl max of ~0.75.

13deg.png?w=800&width=600

The slots also help to increase aileron effectiveness. I just finished the first mold for the prototype. this is the bottom of the fuselage.

20140717_202520.jpg?w=600&width=600

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • 100KM

    @Dwgsparky,

     Thanks for the input. 55 inches is definitely a good size performance wise.

    @ Eli

     yes there is a small drag penalty. However the alternatives to increase the Cl max of the outboard panels are een more draggy. the slat will be made of CF and will be easy to replace if broken off.

    This was my inspiration for using slots:

     300px-Me163efJM.jpg?width=300

  • What's the drag penalty for the slots at low alpha? Seems like you would cruising at <7 deg so you might be paying an endurance penalty for the better near-stall behavior. Also, what about robustness in the case of catching an LE on something? Seems like you could lose the whole front structure.
  • Moderator
    Hi Wayne, the X5 size is ok for very light cameras but it's a trade off between payload and batteries. As a comparison the X6 is MUCH more stable and can fly slower than the X5 but the removable wing panels make shipping easier and cheaper. I would look for a 52-54 wing as ideal with removable wings, love your design.
  • +1 also

  • +1 for interest in the mold making process. Would love to see how that's done.

  • 100KM
    Rhino for CAD and openFoam for CFD.
  • Hi Wayne, looks great. what software are you using for the design?

  • 100KM

    Yes, I was planning on some how to basic videos of the mold making process.

  • 100KM

    @Chris,

     The payload area will be as generous as possible. As for total payload weight, that will mostly depend on the size I end up with. A 80 inch WS model probably would compare to the techpods 4lbs+ payload. 

    The main objective of the techwing is flyability, compact design, simple mechanics and crash-ability.

  • Moderator

    Hi Wayne, this looks great, how's it going to compare to the techpod in terms of payload etc? 

    Also on a separate note. How do you go about making molds for and forming the fuselage? I'd love to see an article on how it's all done.

This reply was deleted.