Damage tolerant flight, Rockwell Collins DARPA work

You may have seen these before

Views: 222

Comment by Wouter van Verre on August 24, 2010 at 1:15pm
Wow! That is pretty impressive!
Comment by Tom Yochum on August 24, 2010 at 1:47pm
I could watch these all day...

There is some really useful technology here for the hobby autopilot: automatic control gain tuning. I hope to someday try to get something like this working. So far, the tricky part has been coming up with a "linear-enough" system model.
Comment by Fabien Bruning on August 24, 2010 at 2:16pm
That looks very nice, I wonder if the system actually knows what it's lost, or just has a self-tuning controller that figures something doesn't work, and adjusts the gains.

Comment by Sami Finnila on August 24, 2010 at 4:15pm
Coupled PID would work very similarly, to loosing a wing for example, if properly tuned. No live tuning of the parameters is needed, really, just the initial tuning. The problem with coupled PID is that they're very hard to tune - at least by hand - since 6 separate coefficients need to be optimized and every coeff affects the other. Automatic tuning of PID is very interesting subject and after that's achieved on the amateur level more complex control loops like coupled PIDs can be introduced as well. Maybe this'd be a future project for the ArduPilot development team? ;P
Comment by I Heart Robotics on August 24, 2010 at 7:36pm
They are using something called relay tuning for their controller design, which looks like an automated version of the Ziegler Nichols method.

This paper was written by some of the team that is now at Rockwell.

This has some info about relay tuning.

Comment by John Arne Birkeland on August 25, 2010 at 12:53am
That is just impressive. Mathematically not that complex, but ohh so hard to make work in practice.
Comment by john bero on August 25, 2010 at 7:28am
Why did they blot out the ground view of the auto landing; is this some secret location?
Comment by Ed on August 26, 2010 at 4:12am
This is something I'm very interested in. Does the controller have a discrete set of possible known faults or does it just re-learn its model constantly? How quickly can it detect a fault? I think this fault tolerant stuff is where UAV research (and a lot of practical control applications in general) is heading. Very interesting and very important.
Comment by Tom Yochum on August 27, 2010 at 8:09am
The controller looks at the inputs it is putting into the system and the outputs that result. It generates a mathematical model that maps the inputs to the outputs. When the wing falls off, the system immediately notices that the existing model no longer matches the input to the output, and it re-computes the model. It is all very quick.

I agree, this is very important stuff for both the hobby-level and the full-sized aircraft level.



You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!

Join DIY Drones

DIY Drones Monthly


Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest 
A list of all T3 contests is here. The current round, the Vertical Horizontal one, is here

© 2016   Created by Chris Anderson.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service