The A B C of laser altimeters

3689619289?profile=original

The SF10 family of laser altimeters was designed by people on this forum. Requests for new features and numerous emails about performance and applications has lead to the development of a compact, light weight, rugged design that can be used in many UAV applications.

We've produce three different versions, each with the same features but having different measuring ranges and representing three broad categories of application - close to the ground, intermediate flight operations and maximum legal altitude. The picture below gives an idea of where we see the different products being used:

3689619232?profile=original

We've matched the cost of available technology to the different operating requirements of small and medium scale UAVs, and the table below shows how we've managed the trade-off between price and performance:

                  Model           Laser                         Detector                          Maximum range          Price

                 SF10/C      High power         High performance APD             >120m                      High

                 SF10/B      High power               Standard APD                       >55m                       Medium

                 SF10/A      Low power                Standard APD                       >25m                        Low

In all models of the SF10 we've kept the energy of the laser pulses very low, making them Class1M - safe for human eyes, and because we believe in high reliability, all models have narrow band optical filters to cut out background sunlight.

Other standard features on all models include:

  • USB port for entering configuration settings
  • I2C bus with configurable address
  • Serial port with configurable baud rate
  • Analog output with configurable ranges
  • Offset trim to match airframe

The team at LightWare would like to thank the hundreds of customers who have contributed to our ongoing effort to improve laser technology for UAS applications. We're having fun, I hope you are too!

L.D.

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Comments

  • Thanks, I have posted a reply on the other thread you linked to here

  • Thanks for the questions Splenkingforth.

    The SF10 has been designed with size in weight in mind. There may not be much practical difference between using a 2 and a 10 so it's up to you to decide which will fit better into your airframe.

    I can tell you that future developments for UAV applications will be based on the SF10 configuration and there are longer range and higher speed models available that are plug-and-play replacements. Here is an example.

    We see the SF02 as being more suited to doing tests and performing experiments since it has additional features that are not directly relevant to UAV applications.

  • Thanks for the reply.

    We are looking to improve autoland with Arduplane. Would the 10 be better? I see it has better resolution 0.01 vs 0.05. We need a more controlled flare and touch down so if it achieves a true 25m height. that would be fine.

    Your thoughts as there is very little price difference?

  • The new revision of the SF02 has already started to ship and I think the next batch will be coming off the line in about 10 days.

  • Any news on when the SF02 will be available. Lead time?

  • We're working to get all the SF10's as stock items. Right now (6 Sept 2014) they're on about three weeks lead time.

  • Hi :) Is there any estimation when the SF10/C will be back in stock again?

  • Developer

    I think it'll work with ArduCopter 3.2.  It won't work with AC3.1.5.  There's a wiki page here showing how to hitch up the SF02.

  • I don't know enough about the status of the ArduCopter software to confirm that the SF10s can be used plug-n-play. However, the SF10s have the same interfaces as the SF02 so any product that has the code for the SF02 should be able to use the SF10s.

  • Can it be used with ArduCopter "out of the box" right now?

    Or does it need code changes, thich are to be done?

This reply was deleted.