So , more than a few people have expressed concern over the amount of wing flex exhibited by the techpod . To exhibit just some of the strenght of the 9 mm OD 7 mm ID tubes I use I put together this quick clip .
that is 2 x 42 inch long 9mm tubes connected by a 6 inch x 7 mm inner connector rod , lifting a 5 gallon jug of water @ 42lbs suspended in the middle .good for a 8.4 g loading with a 5 lbs techpod and not all the lift comes from the tips unlike this demo . the spar could have taken much more. You may notice the two small nylon pieces in the middle . these keep the whole thing from exploding .
find out more about the techpod at hobbyuav.com
Comment by Harry on August 31, 2012 at 4:02pm That is a really pretty design. I gots a thing for pushers, especially pod and boom.
Comment by wayne garris on August 31, 2012 at 4:43pm harry,
thanks,got them on pre-order on kickstarter . I would appreciate the help to make this happen.any questions feel free to pm me
wayne
Comment by Carl La France on September 2, 2012 at 6:51pm
Comment by Kelvin Choo on April 16, 2013 at 12:13am I have completed the maiden flight test on the techpod. And found few design flaws. My experience , I have been flying RC for close to ten years. Also built and flown few turbines jets.
1. No proper assembly manual. Lots of trial fit.
2. Certain parts not fit well, need some filling and cutting etc.
3. Certain parts missing, not included in the kit.
4. The clamping action of the carbon spar to maintain the wings inposition on the fuselage is not ideal or safe. I have to make my own mod.
5. The wings too flexible. During a dive, when the wings flex upwards too much, the aileron authority become much less. This plane is not meant to sustained high G.
6/ Lost of parts not serviceable, for example, if u wanna change the wing servo for some reason, u need to cut open the wing.
7. The space inside the techpod not impressive. Rather too small.
8. No mentioned the position of the CG. Being experience in RC, I can make a good guess. LOL.
9. The nose plastic and fuselage bottom cover, optically poor. I have replace it with actual CCTV dome cover.
10. The motor is not removable after installation, unless u cut some of the fuselage away. I have to devise my own motor mount over the existing one to make the motor removable.
Comment by wayne garris on April 22, 2013 at 9:28pm Comment
Season Two of the Trust Time Trial (T3) Contest has now begun. The fourth round is an accuracy round for multicopters, which requires contestants to fly a cube. The deadline is April 14th.51 members
83 members
24 members
682 members
1289 members
© 2013 Created by Chris Anderson.
Powered by

You need to be a member of DIY Drones to add comments!
Join DIY Drones