Agisoft Photoscan vs Pix4uav

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone has any experience using the different types of image processing software.

I'm particularly interested in the creation of DEMs for terrain/surface mapping.

I've been looking at the options out there. Something I'm confused about is why Pix4uav is so expensive compared to AgiSoft Photoscan.

Pix4UAV is $21000 (15500 euro)

Agisoft Photoscan is $3499 (2600 euro)

Is it really worth the extra cost?

EDIT: Hello I should edit this now as the new Pix4DMapper is cheaper and they have montly and yearly rental options

http://pix4d.com/buy_rent/

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I have Photoscan and have been really impressed with the results. Now, with that said, I'd shell out for Pix4D if their results were over and above better, but I won't shell out $21K US. I have a full copy of ArcGIS (terrible imagery capabilities, I know) that cost about that much. There would have to be some huge selling points for me to let go of $21K for image processing software right now given the possibility of being put out of business by the corporate-owned FAA.

    • That is a very good comment. No one knows for sure what products, manufacturers, or even corporate entities the FAA will approve, but everyone knows who the large Federal players are. Seems smart to me that we get our experience on the least costly options that do the job right now. The experience should speak volumes in a few years.

    • Hello the new version is somewhat cheaper to buy and there's rental options now. Still it's twice the price of photoscan. However the raycloud editor looks amazing!

      http://pix4d.com/buy_rent/

  • Hi Guys, I have used both of these softwares, I find Photoscan to be a little lacking in regards to what Pix4D can do. I have gotten better results with Pix4D for the same data set. And the ability to edit the photo mosaic afterwards is a definite plus. Sometime in the next month or so I will publish a blog post regarding this comparison. The effort was made to compare geographic precisions and measurement precisions using Airborne LiDAR, direct measurement and using UAVs with different cameras, GoPro, Canon SX260, Sony Nex7 and Nikon D600. Hopefully the results will be enlightening.

    • So, I have not made the blog post on this topic yet. but I did give a talk on it at Dronecon 2014 which is now online. 

      http://youtu.be/4mQbYQphdXk

    • Hello Jamie. I'm looking forward to seeing your blog. From the data I've seen so far spatial accuracies are far out of what UAV sales people are making them out to be. I'd be interested in seeing a comparison of spatial accuracies not just from GCP's but at random locations in the survey area.

    • Interesting post Jaime

      Keep us updated!

    • Jaime, I look forward to that post. In the next month or two I plan on evaluating both products to compare capabilities and quality prior to purchase/rental. Thanks!

  • Hi, Mark--

    I see I'm a couple of months late to your post--but I was wondering if you've received any information--I've got a similar question myself.  We've been using Pix4UAV for image processing but I'm looking into lower-cost (but just as accurate) SFM approaches to recreating DEMs from UAV photography (archaeological applications)  Would be really interested in hearing what other people have found out.

    Best,

    Steve

    • Hello Steve. No information off anyone but the latest version of Pix4 is cheaper and they offer a monthly and yearly rental option now. After seeing their raycloud editor in action I think I would go with Pix4DMapper if I had the funds available.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @RoboticMasters: Monaco GP Circuit in the Donkey Sim (coming soon). Including buildings, tunnel and all! https://github.com/robotics-masters/sim-donkeycar-f1/tree/f1-tracks @diyr…
17 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @breadcentric: Here are the details of #AWSDeepRacer finals: https://blog.deepracing.io/2020/12/01/aws-deepracer-league-finals-2020-round-1-schedule/ #awsreinvent2020 #AWSreInvent https://t.co/ovqsjp8V…
17 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @breadcentric: #AWSDeepRacer League #awsreinvent2020 Open race is on Dec 1st - Dec 31st in three categories, 15 DeepRacer Evo (with LIDA…
17 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @SmallpixelCar @diyrobocars It's just something that's easy to track with chroma keying. I ended up using different colors on th…
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @TinkerGen_: "The Tinkergen MARK ($199) is my new favorite starter robocar. It’s got everything — computer vision, deep learning, sensor…
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Join our FREE Sumo Competition 🤖🏆 👉 https://roboton.io/ranking/vsc2020 #sumo #robot #edtech #competition #games4ed https://t.co/WOx…
Nov 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of Tinkergen MARK robocar https://ift.tt/36IeZHc
Nov 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Our review of the @TinkerGen_ MARK robocar, which is the best on the market right now https://diyrobocars.com/2020/11/15/first-impressions-of-tinkergen-mark-robocar/ https://t.co/ENIlU5SfZ2
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Ingmar_Stapel: I have now explained the OpenBot project in great detail on my blog with 12 articles step by step. I hope you enjoy read…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: This is a must attend. Click the link, follow link to read the story, sign up. #chaos2020 #digitalconnection #digitalworld ht…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Got a new chassis for outdoor races (hobbyking Quantum Vandal) but I totally didn't expect that it might cause problems for my g…
Nov 11
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of the Intel OpenBot https://ift.tt/36qkVV4
Nov 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Excellent use of cardboard instead of 3D printing! https://twitter.com/Ingmar_Stapel/status/1324960595318333441
Nov 7
More…