I've seen a few "X" airframes around that appear to have a wider space between the front props than the rear. (eg: steadidrone).This seems strange to me, as ideally you'd want a totally square prop layout so you can place the FC right in the centre for more predictable handling. But - if steadidrone is an example - the APM can manage this no problem.I understand that the wider front props is usually to assist video, but what about the performance impact? How does a quad handle when the prop footprint is not completely square? I thought you had to be "strict" with the square footprint?Also, I'm sure some even have a shorter "wheelbase" as well; ie the distance between the front and rear prop "axles" is less than the distance between the left and right props.
You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!
Replies
So what's the advantage - if any - of the V layout? I can only think of one, but does it handle any better/worse/differently?
Choose the Frame Setup "V" (Mission Planner 1.2.52).
Hello Euan Ramsay, I think this information can help you!