Code handling: X8 vs "Double X4"?

Can anyone comment on how the apm code handles X8 configurations? (Haven't delved into the code). More specifically, does AC 3.x send the exact same signal to the coax bottom and top motors on each arm, or does it somehow handle them differently?

Asking because I am thinking of playing with a "double X4", by just "Y'ing"  two motors to one ESC and configuring the copter as an X4 quad. I know I'll loose the redudancy that comes with separate ESCs , but I just happen to have some spare ESC's that have double the capacity required ...

And it seems that as long as one of the two motors can handle double the required thrust, loosing one motor in flight would still avoid a crash so I'd still have at least motor redundancy ...

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thanks for your replies.  Scott, I agree that in theory one would think each motor feedback to the ESC may be different so this would not work. Yet it does work on the bench, (two identical  motors on one esc, bypassing  fc) .   Some have  successfully flown that set-up on other controllers .

    In general, I was wondering what, if any, the FC does in an X8 config that does not exactly duplicates  the signal to two motors on each arm, instead of one in X4 configuration. Seems like some aerodydnamic considerations on coax set-ups could be taken into consideration and taken advantage of by the fc  ( e.g. different pitches on top and bottom propellers, or code handling failure of one motor) yet don't know what the scoop is ...

  • Don't do it :)

  • ESCs measure signals from the motor they are driving to control timing. I think connecting two motors to one esc would not work well.
This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @TinkerGen_: "The Tinkergen MARK ($199) is my new favorite starter robocar. It’s got everything — computer vision, deep learning, sensor…
6 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
6 hours ago
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Join our FREE Sumo Competition 🤖🏆 👉 https://roboton.io/ranking/vsc2020 #sumo #robot #edtech #competition #games4ed https://t.co/WOx…
Nov 16
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of Tinkergen MARK robocar https://ift.tt/36IeZHc
Nov 16
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Our review of the @TinkerGen_ MARK robocar, which is the best on the market right now https://diyrobocars.com/2020/11/15/first-impressions-of-tinkergen-mark-robocar/ https://t.co/ENIlU5SfZ2
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @Ingmar_Stapel: I have now explained the OpenBot project in great detail on my blog with 12 articles step by step. I hope you enjoy read…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DAVGtech: This is a must attend. Click the link, follow link to read the story, sign up. #chaos2020 #digitalconnection #digitalworld ht…
Nov 15
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Got a new chassis for outdoor races (hobbyking Quantum Vandal) but I totally didn't expect that it might cause problems for my g…
Nov 11
DIY Drones via Twitter
First impressions of the Intel OpenBot https://ift.tt/36qkVV4
Nov 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 9
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Excellent use of cardboard instead of 3D printing! https://twitter.com/Ingmar_Stapel/status/1324960595318333441
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: We've got a record 50 teams competing in this month's @DIYRobocars @donkey_car virtual AI car race. Starting today at 10:00am…
Nov 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Nov 6
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Car's view, using a fisheye camera. The ceiling light tracking algorithm gave me some ideas to improve ConeSLAM, and having grou…
Nov 5
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: To get ground truth I measured the rug, found the pixel coordinates of its corners, calibrated my phone camera with my standard…
Nov 5
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @DIYRobocars is back in December, but outside. Time to reinvestigate ConeSLAM! I rigged up a quick and dirty ground-truth captur…
Nov 5
More…