this is my old test doing with my professional verison of Hexafox
Max I saw your code , but i don't found the matrixtable developed in ArducopterNg , Why ? That was very flexible and you can develop any kind of configuration. Quad , Quadx , Hexa , Okto. I saw that the pirates instead use it inside the code i think that i's better to reimplement it.
Theoretically the lower prop should have a higher pitch than the upper prop. With the correct setup there is no loss. All full-size coaxials use this approach. Obviously they have to as they are on the same shaft. IMHO it is better to have all at the same rpm and use the correct pitch on the lower prop for the highest efficiency.
Thanks. Is it possible to make all the top props CW and all the bottom CCW? The reason is there are limited CW (pusher) props but lots of CCW prop choices. This will give more options for tuning the lower prop pitch.
Replies
Hi ,
this is my old test doing with my professional verison of Hexafox
Max I saw your code , but i don't found the matrixtable developed in ArducopterNg , Why ? That was very flexible and you can develop any kind of configuration. Quad , Quadx , Hexa , Okto. I saw that the pirates instead use it inside the code i think that i's better to reimplement it.
Best
Roberto
Thanks.