Is APM the way to go?

Hi,

Everywhere I look I read that APM is hard to dial in and Naza or others always seem to be more stable.

Can APM really be tuned to be as stable as a NAZA for example? I mean, is the hardware on par with others?

If the GPS for example is not precise enough, no matter how much tuning you do, it will never be as good as another one with a better GPS unit.

Also, more and more people are talking about PX4 here as what seems to be a more future-proof platform, is it really the case? Is an APM 3.0 with better hardware around the corner?

I'm trying to learn as much as possible before ordering anything, so any advice here will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks! 

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hey guys,

    Thanks for the feedback.

    @u4eake: u say "Hardware is useless without a good firmware to run it." and this is totally true, but the opposite is also true. Even the best firmware in the world is useless without some good hardware to host it.

    PX4 looks promising to me. The CEO of 3DR himself sees it as the platform of the future (http://oddcopter.com/2013/02/22/an-interview-with-chris-anderson-ce...)

    I'm a sport heli pilot and I've been into RC stuff for years, so tuning is not something I am afraid of, but the problem I have right now is I keep reading posts and looking at videos where people are saying that their APM drone is not flying too great, but this is only because it is not dialed in yet. I would like to find someone who actually has it dialed in and who is saying "look at my APM drone, it's as good as NAZA or any other."

    The more I look into it, the more I'm worried, because from what I see. It's not only hard to tune (that wouldn't be a problem). It's more like it impossible to tune it to be as good as let's say a NAZA.

    On the other end, my biggest interest is UAV and the Mission Planner software looks totally awesome. This is clearly way better than what others are offering. NAZA doesn't even offer waypoints.

    Maybe I will just take my time to build my drone and put something very basic like a KK2 at the heart of it for now and see how APM evolves in the next months.

    I'm really split apart, because I have helis to fly and enjoy stuff like 3d and high adrenaline flying, so APM with all its options and waypoints is really what I'm looking for, but I just don't want to invest hundreds of dollars and be sorry at the end because it's not as good as expected.

  • the APM firmware is far verstile as compared to NAZA. if u see the naza utility it hardly has any configuration parameters. it has just been tuned well for a particular airframe. APM has a very powerfull code. just fix the hardware well and you have fantastic quad.

  • 100KM

    The heart of the APM hardware is a 8 bit atmel processor running at 16Mhz.  The heart of the px4 is a 32 bit ARM processor running at 168Mhz.  

    The naza has a seperate, vibration dampened sensorunit (IMU), while the imu of the APM are all onboard and you have to take care of vibration dampening yourself.

    But I do believe that the APM, in capable hands, can perform very close to the naza.  AND APM is the only platform to support free and very extensive waypoint navigation.  The features available on APM are not matched by other commercial platforms, at least not without adding substantial hardware and/or cost to the system.

    Have you seen the movie "Real Steel" ?  APM is like the kid's sparring bot.  On paper inferior to it's competitors, but with it's excellent programming and good care from a motivated person, it can give the "better" ones a nice surprise.

    Hardware is useless without a good firmware to run it.

    So it actually depends on you which way you wanna go.  Are you rich and not very interested in the heart of uav's (just wanna fly, don't care how it all works) then go for the alternatives.

    But if you don't have lots of $$$ to spend and are willing and motivated to put some time in it and learn a lot, then APM is certainly a great platform.

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Did I get rid of hand-tuned parameters? Yes. Am I still hand-tuning more parameters? Also yes. I have a few knobs to address the…
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: I'm not going to spoil it, but (after charging the battery) this works way better than it has any right to. The car is now faste…
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: Decided to just see what happens if I run the sim-trained neural net on the car, with some safety rails around max throttle slew…
Monday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Sep 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: @a1k0n @diyrobocars I learned from this. This is my speed profile. Looks like I am too conservative on the right side of…
Sep 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: @SmallpixelCar @diyrobocars Dot color is speed; brighter is faster. Yeah, it has less room to explore in the tighter part, and t…
Sep 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @a1k0n: I'm gonna try to do proper offline reinforcement learning for @diyrobocars and throw away all my manual parameter tuning for the…
Sep 23
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @circuitlaunch: DIY Robocars & Brazilian BBQ - Sat 10/1. Our track combines hairpin curves with an intersection for max danger. Take tha…
Sep 22
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Had an great test today on @RAMS_RC_Club track. However the car starts to drift at 40mph. Some experts recommended to ch…
Sep 11
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @gclue_akira: 世界最速 チームtamiyaのaiカー https://t.co/1Qq2zOeftG
Sep 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @DanielChiaJH: Always a good time working on my @diyrobocars car at @circuitlaunch. Still got some work to do if I’m to beat @a1k0n howe…
Sep 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: My new speed profile for @RAMS_RC_Club track https://t.co/RtLb7TcgIJ
Sep 10
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Practiced at @RAMS_RC_Club today with my new @ARRMARC car https://t.co/AEu2hCx89T
Aug 28
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Aug 24
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @gclue_akira: 柏の葉で走行させてるjetracerの中身 #instantNeRF #jetracer https://t.co/giVvuE4hP7
Jul 4
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Cool web-based self-driving simulator. Click save when the AI does the right thing https://github.com/pncsoares/self-driving-car
Jul 4
More…