Hi folks,
I'm a complete newbie to drones and quadcopters and at the crucial point to decide what to buy for a quadcopter in X layout. For choosing an airframe, motors, ESC, and so on there are a lot of great examples, tutorials and build descriptions around. When it comes to Autopliot Hardware and Software, I can't decide which project to go for.

My feature wishlist to the quadcopter would be:

- build it yourself with open source software and hardware where possible
- learn to fly ;-)
- add a telemetry downlink
- fly GPS based missions
- add a gimbal and camera for aerial videography

When browsing for Autopilot Hardware I started of with this great table in the multicopter.org Wiki
http://multicopter.org/wiki/Multicopter_Table

My ideal world view was like: "Find an autopilot software, that matches my wishlist AND runs on a general purpose Open Source CPU board, like Arduino, RaspberryPi or BeagleBoard." - with the intention in mind to use the CPU board for other DIY projects as well. But I get the impression, that projects that started for example on Arduino moved on to custom hardware boards due to CPU and memory restrictions, like AeroQaud (with the AeroQuad 32 Flight Control Board) and APM (former Arducopter) (with the Pixhawk). Now I understand that these custom hardware boards are all published as open source as well, my concern here is that they are not so wide spread in non-aerial DIY and maker communities and not so suitable for other "non-vehicle" projects.

Of course beside the hardware, which software project should I go for, since the basic features are similar, and high level features like GPS are supported by several projects as well.

My question now is: in your personal opinion and with your experience, which open source autopilot would you choose? And: Am I maybe over-analysing things and you usually never strip your quad for parts anyway - cause it's too much fun to fly ;-)

Thanks for your opinions and regards from Germany,
Martin

You need to be a member of diydrones to add comments!

Join diydrones

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Martin,

    I first chose the APM 2.6 because it was the only approachable option for traditional helis (both cost and software support).

    There may be other options but I could only find stuff like DJI which for a comparable trad heli setup would cost over $11,000.

    I was happy with the 2.6.  The firmware was capable and improving.  The mission planner was also.  Help was available here.  The worst part was the hardware.  The APM is not ready for mistakes in voltage.  When I fried the board, I happily upgraded to Pixhawk which seems like a comprehesive upgrade but completely compatible with what I had alread learned with the APM.

  • Nobody up for a small discussion?
    Let me rephrase my question: "How did you choose your flight controller?"
    Greetings

This reply was deleted.

Activity

DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Our next @DIYRobocars virtual AI car race is next Saturday. Compete from home using the @donkey_car simulator -- no physical ca…
yesterday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @RoboticMasters: Students from @Sydney_Uni working hard on improvements and changes to @donkey_car simulator. @diyrobocars @adafruit…
yesterday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Practice virtual race this Saturday; the real thing will be on Oct 3 https://www.meetup.com/DIYRobocars/
Wednesday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Wednesday
Derrick Davies liked lisa TDrones's profile
Wednesday
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Sep 21
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SahikaGenc: AWS DeepRacer & Hot Wheels Track https://youtu.be/4H0Ei07RdR4 via @YouTube
Sep 14
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Sep 8
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @davsca1: We are releasing the code of our Fisher Information Field, the first dedicated map for perception-aware planning that is >10x…
Sep 8
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: How this works: 1)object detection to find cones in single camera image, 30 frames/sec on @NVIDIAEmbedded Xavier. 2)comp…
Sep 8
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @SmallpixelCar: Use two color cones to guide the robocar. No map needed, on onsite training needed. Just place the cones and it will fol…
Sep 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
Sep 7
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @roboton_io: Great to see http://roboton.io running at 60fps on the cheapest #chromebook we could find! #edtech #robotics #educat…
Sep 3
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @openmvcam: Crazy in-depth article about using the OpenMV Cam for Astrophotography: https://github.com/frank26080115/OpemMV-Astrophotography-Gear https://t.co/BPoK9QDEwS
Sep 3
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @openmvcam: Hi folks, it's finally here! Our first draft of our Arduino Interface Library is out! It works over SoftwareSerial, Hardware…
Sep 3
DIY Robocars via Twitter
RT @chr1sa: Please let them have an open API. This would be perfect for @DIYRobocars races https://twitter.com/NintendoAmerica/status/1301513099707658246
Sep 3
More…