- The Release of the 3D Robotics Rover. This is extremely significant because an APM compatible rover will help drive up the amount of users and contributors to the Rover side of the APM Open Source Development (ArduRover is used far less than ArduPlane and ArduCopter). Once ArduPlane, Copter, and Rover all become more equal as far as user base we should start to see the APM turn into a more universal product that will be getting extremely close to being ready for commercial applications and entrepreneurs.
- The ability to Run Multiple Ardu Softwares simultaneously for "Hybrid Type" vehicles like a QuadRover, HeliBoat, or QuadPlane) These types of vehicles seem to be very popular with the hobbyist base of APM users who enjoy building their own vehicles and concepts themselves. The real do it yourselfers in the Diy Drones Community aren't limited by creativity or imagination for drone concepts. We are limited by the small selection of affordable Drone Hardware, Accessories, and overall product selection when it comes down to commercial grade products at a consumer price.
- Sense and Avoid open source collaboration will take off like a rocket when 3DR releases their Rover Platform because this will allow for this extremely large community to take part in the development of Sense And Avoid Software safely from the ground. If you seemed puzzled by my last sentence try looking at it this way. The community can't safely Open Source Develop a good Sense and Avoid System in the "sky" because this is not only extremely dangerous but we would all go through a dozen quads a month testing out confirmed and potential software codes for the system. "I estimate that 50% or more of the software for an Aerial Sense and Avoid System could be written safely on the ground using rovers".
- The release of APM compatible accessories and attachments will allow for a wider variety of applications that the APM will be able to be used for. This will also allow for a wider variety of companies and entrepreneurs to join in on the Open Source Development and Collaboration. "This will revolutionize this community greatly because during open source development here the biggest obstacle is that we all use different brands of electronics which doesn't allow for everyone to be able to run certain functions or software with the equipment they own". "If we are all universally using the same brand (such as 3D Robotics) electronics, attachments, motors, batteries, etc it will take this Open Source Community to the Upper Echelon of Open Source Communities".
- The Release of 3D Robotics Marine Vehicles such as water surface vehicles and submersible marine vehicles. Currently Agriculture is ranked as the #1 current marketable application for commercial drones but I would argue that before the end of the decade the Marine Drone market will be the largest non military application for commercial grade drones . This will allow for universities all over the world to add a low cost submersible drone to their current marine biology and oceanography programs with a low cost marine vehicle for lakes and other bodies of waters. It would probably catch the eye of government agencies like the Department of Natural Resources and other environmental groups and agencies who are currently looking to attach sensors and hi-tech cameras onto Quads and Marines Vehicles for scientific purposes such as Environmental 3D Mapping and ecosystem management. Many government agencies need these ASAP so if a company like 3D Robotics can provide them with a suitable product the Government is more likely to award grants to companies like 3DR for Drone R & D
"Take it Easy Diy Drones",
Joshua Johnson - Diy Drones News- Drone Cafe -
Comments
@Dan, Wow nice piece of Hardware you got their!!! I don't know for sure but if I had to guess I would have to think that 3DR will continue to work on and update the APM. When you break down the PIX and the APM they are two very different products that appeal to two very different groups/markets. I'm going off of pure opinion but I assume they are working fully steam ahead on R & D of both AutoPilot Systems.
@PenPen, I myself also agree that for things to remain Diy things have to stay affordable and easy to replace. Hopefully we will see a lowcost 3D Printer come out of 3DR or another company like them. In one of my CAD classes we get to build a 3D Printed 3D Printer. With all the electronics only costing around $300 bucks from PrinterBot. Once more hobbyists own 3D Printers and are capable of Engineering Simple designs things will be much more affordable for us average joes who would rather print out a new part then purchase a new part.
Number 5 on the list reminded me of this site http://openrov.com/ In a way it reminds me of DIYdrones.
Thorsten,
I don't think too that 3DR can do/manufacturer it all including batteries and sensors. Buy best of different products from OEM and re-label , may be. Universally using same brand?! :)
IMHO Monopoly is not part of DIY game. Integration of best products from various specialty house can of course be done by 3DR if we accept the fact that we cannot do/make it all under same roof.
I am not so sure that "If we are all universally using the same brand...it will take this Open Source Community to the Upper Echelon of Open Source Communities"...
Great stuff,
But you should note, I just completed a sense and avoid project, testing many different sensors (pic shows one set up), in a harsh environment, and the APM doesn't have cycles to do it.
I had to add another Arduino, and hijack the PPM signal. So anyone needs to consider this before trying sense and avoid with APM. Pix is likely OK, but when you know the Arduino, like most of use do, it is just easier to add one.
Is it time to update the APM, or is 3DR 100% committed to PIX?
I'm working on open source stuff essentially for pleasure. I like learning, discovering, testing, finding solution, looking how others peoples have fix their problems, helping, suggesting, etc.... As i'm a software guy, (professionally and as a hobby), i'm used to have a "search/fail/test/success loop" in collaboration of open source software, which as it doesn't involve hardware, doesn't cost anything (or a few). But with hardware based project, the "cost" isn't the same and sometimes failure is more than just "fail/rethink/retry" processising, but more a "eat my credit card" action.
I like the "don't be afraid to fail, learn from it and retry", especially in DIY / open source project. Break and rebuild is part of the pleasure, that's why i think, diy plateform should be more affordable.
@Penpen, Why do you find consumer prices (affordable) important to the community and open source development?
@Thanks for the +1's penpen also thanks for liking the blog!
Much appreciated.
Joshua Johnson
+1 to all, but especially affordable stuff -_-